Re: Terrible interactivity with 2.6.0-t9-mm3

["Prakash K. Cheemplavam" <prakashkc@gmx.de>]

Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
>>
>> After sending out multiple patches I should have been more clear. Just
>> to avoid confusion:
>>
>> * the init_cpu_khz patch goes along side Thomas' patch.
>> * the more experimental sched_clock() -> monotonic_clock() patch I just
>> sent out for testing replaces Thomas' patch.
> 
> 
> 
> I now tried the second one and it seems to work, tough I am not sure 
> whether the performance is as good as APCI timer deavt. It seems that 
> now CPU Hz is not shown anymore. Have a look at my dmesg:
> 
> 
> Linux version 2.6.0-test9-love3 (root@tachyon) (gcc-Version 3.3.2 
> 20031022 (Gentoo Linux 3.3.2-r2, propolice)) #16 Tue Nov 18 13:54:04 CET 
> 2003
> BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
>  BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009f800 (usable)
>  BIOS-e820: 000000000009f800 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
>  BIOS-e820: 00000000000f0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
>  BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000003fff0000 (usable)
>  BIOS-e820: 000000003fff0000 - 000000003fff3000 (ACPI NVS)
>  BIOS-e820: 000000003fff3000 - 0000000040000000 (ACPI data)
>  BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec01000 (reserved)
>  BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved)
>  BIOS-e820: 00000000ffff0000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
> 127MB HIGHMEM available.
> 896MB LOWMEM available.
> On node 0 totalpages: 262128
>   DMA zone: 4096 pages, LIFO batch:1
>   Normal zone: 225280 pages, LIFO batch:16
>   HighMem zone: 32752 pages, LIFO batch:7
> DMI 2.2 present.
> ACPI: RSDP (v000 Nvidia                                    ) @ 0x000f6b60
> ACPI: RSDT (v001 Nvidia AWRDACPI 0x42302e31 AWRD 0x00000000) @ 0x3fff3000
> ACPI: FADT (v001 Nvidia AWRDACPI 0x42302e31 AWRD 0x00000000) @ 0x3fff3040
> ACPI: MADT (v001 Nvidia AWRDACPI 0x42302e31 AWRD 0x00000000) @ 0x3fff79c0
> ACPI: DSDT (v001 NVIDIA AWRDACPI 0x00001000 MSFT 0x0100000d) @ 0x00000000
> ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x4008
> Building zonelist for node : 0
> Kernel command line: root=/dev/hde6 hdg=none vga=0x51A 
> video=vesa:mtrr,ywrap elevator=cfq
> ide_setup: hdg=none
> current: c0499a60
> current->thread_info: c0528000
> Initializing CPU#0
> PID hash table entries: 4096 (order 12: 32768 bytes)
> Using <NULL> for high-res timesource

[snip]

So I deactivated the PM timer again and my computer is much faster 
again. Haven prime in the background taking 100% doesn't noticeable 
affect deskop performance. But I think I know where the problem lies:

current: c0499a60
current->thread_info: c0528000
Initializing CPU#0
PID hash table entries: 4096 (order 12: 32768 bytes)
Detected 2004.698 MHz processor.
Using tsc for high-res timesource


In above dmesg you can see that nothing was used as timesource, but here 
in current dmesg tsc is used. Is this normal or a bug? Need I pass a 
kernel paramtere when pm timer is enbaled?

bye

Prakash