From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@myrealbox.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hard links create local DoS vulnerability and security problems
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:54:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FC27019.7010402@myrealbox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa.l1quqni.v405hu@ifi.uio.no>
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>
> In any case, if a user is *MAKING* a program set-UID, it's probably because
> he *wants* it to run as himself even if others invoke it (otherwise, he
> could just leave it in ~/bin and be happy). So this is really a red herring,
> as it's only a problem if (a) he decides to get rid of the binary, and fails
> to do so because of hard links he doesn't know about, or (b) he's an idiot
> programmer and it malfunctions if invoked with an odd argv[0]....
Right... but non-privileged users _can't_ delete these extra links, even
if they notice them from the link count. And non-idiots do make
security errors -- they just fix them. But in this case, fixing the
error after the fact may be impossible without root's help.
And how many package managers / install scripts check for hard links of
files they're about to overwrite?
--Andy
next parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-24 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.hevpbbs.u5q2r6@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.l1quqni.v405hu@ifi.uio.no>
2003-11-24 20:54 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2003-11-24 21:16 ` hard links create local DoS vulnerability and security problems Linus Torvalds
2003-11-24 23:28 ` Ricky Beam
2003-11-24 22:04 ` John Bradford
2003-11-24 22:12 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-11-25 12:10 ` John Bradford
2003-11-25 12:18 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-11-25 13:12 ` John Bradford
2003-11-24 16:36 Jakob Lell
2003-11-24 17:05 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-11-24 20:42 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-11-24 17:14 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-11-24 17:35 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-11-25 3:16 ` Matthias Andree
2003-11-25 14:48 ` Jan Kara
2003-11-25 15:27 ` Jakob Lell
2003-11-24 17:37 ` Rudo Thomas
2003-11-24 18:10 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-11-24 18:22 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-11-24 17:57 ` Jakob Lell
2003-11-24 18:08 ` splite
2003-11-24 18:13 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-11-24 18:24 ` Jakob Lell
2003-11-24 23:57 ` bill davidsen
2003-11-24 18:18 ` Jakob Lell
2003-11-24 18:29 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-11-24 18:21 ` Michael Buesch
2003-11-24 18:35 ` Jakob Lell
2003-11-24 18:53 ` Chris Wright
2003-11-25 0:04 ` bill davidsen
2003-11-25 13:54 ` Jesse Pollard
2003-11-24 23:50 ` bill davidsen
2003-11-25 0:22 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-11-25 0:35 ` Chris Wright
2003-11-25 8:15 ` Amon Ott
2003-11-25 16:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-11-25 11:26 ` Gianni Tedesco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FC27019.7010402@myrealbox.com \
--to=luto@myrealbox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox