From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264461AbTLCBXt (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 20:23:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264468AbTLCBXt (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 20:23:49 -0500 Received: from mail.netzentry.com ([157.22.10.66]:48651 "EHLO netzentry.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264461AbTLCBXq (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 20:23:46 -0500 Message-ID: <3FCD3B0F.6060700@netzentry.com> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 17:23:27 -0800 From: "b@netzentry.com" Reply-To: b@netzentry.com Organization: b@netzentry.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pomac@vapor.com CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org How is the performance of the generic IDE driver? My experience that it was almost unusable (kernel 2.4.22, 2.4.23) (fsck taking hours, etc) >>>On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 01:58, Allen Martin wrote: -----Original >>>Message----- From: Ian Kumlien [mailto:pomac@vapor.com] Sent: >>>Tuesday, December 02, 2003 4:47 PM >>> >>>Well, IDE is what i'd blame. My original experience about lost >>>interrupts leads me to ide. Since i never loose interrupts >>>without io-apic. >> >>Can someone who has a system showing this problem try booting >>from a PCI IDE card to see if it makes any difference? I'd try >>the experiment here, but I can't reproduce the hanging that's >>being reported. >Or just to verify boot a kernel without the nvidia/amd ide driver >and io-apic enabled. > > -- Ian Kumlien