From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265114AbTLFL5U (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 06:57:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265124AbTLFL5U (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 06:57:20 -0500 Received: from port-212-202-157-212.reverse.qsc.de ([212.202.157.212]:52689 "EHLO bender.portrix.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265114AbTLFL5T (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 06:57:19 -0500 Message-ID: <3FD1C3E2.1050207@portrix.net> Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 12:56:18 +0100 From: Jan Dittmer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031022 Debian/1.5-1.he-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jens Benecke CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Which optimization for different CPUs? References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.7.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jens Benecke wrote: | Hi, | | I have several servers and workstations. What optimization level in the | kernel configuration is the maximum possible if I want to use the same | kernel | Try CONFIG_M686. Jan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/0cPiLqMJRclVKIYRAh9eAJ9UeGuMoFWXdOwFrqHhSYTiMIdAPQCfX+g8 N1fPw1+QETTM6Jau8VkBfcw= =HbIJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----