From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263764AbTLJRCk (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:02:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263766AbTLJRCk (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:02:40 -0500 Received: from w130.z209220038.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net ([209.220.38.130]:41461 "EHLO mail.inostor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263764AbTLJRCJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 12:02:09 -0500 Message-ID: <3FD7507E.30601@inostor.com> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:57:34 -0800 From: Tom Dickson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Bonding gigabit cards w 2.4.20 switch question X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm testing bonding e1000 cards under 2.4.20 and it seems to work fine, however: I would like to know a decent brand of switch that can support round-robin or XOR at gigabit speeds. Documentation/networking/bonding.txt has only 10/100 information in it. Is there any preferred linux supporting brand? Also, should I submit a bug report on the fact that bonding using the ns83820.o driver causes kernel panics, or is that a known issue? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-nr2 (Windows 2000) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/11B+2dxAfYNwANIRAsauAJ9iBMGtGcNWO4sjClQyCuaslJNGdACfRkYf PlcVYJ+fmFcXFQe8FRoI9Rk= =vp6a -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----