From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264387AbTLKIOy (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 03:14:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264395AbTLKIOx (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 03:14:53 -0500 Received: from mail-10.iinet.net.au ([203.59.3.42]:29369 "HELO mail.iinet.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S264387AbTLKIOu (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 03:14:50 -0500 Message-ID: <3FD82775.3050303@cyberone.com.au> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:14:45 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030827 Debian/1.4-3 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rhino CC: linux-kernel , Anton Blanchard , Ingo Molnar , Rusty Russell , "Martin J. Bligh" , "Nakajima, Jun" , Mark Wong , wli@holomorphy.com Subject: Re: [CFT][RFC] HT scheduler References: <3FD3FD52.7020001@cyberone.com.au> <20031208155904.GF19412@krispykreme> <3FD50456.3050003@cyberone.com.au> <20031209001412.GG19412@krispykreme> <3FD7F1B9.5080100@cyberone.com.au> <3FD81BA4.8070602@cyberone.com.au> <20031211060120.4769a0e8.rhino9@terra.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20031211060120.4769a0e8.rhino9@terra.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rhino wrote: >On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:24:20 +1100 >Nick Piggin wrote: > > >> >>Nick Piggin wrote: >> >> >>>http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/w26/ >>>Against 2.6.0-test11 >>> >> >>Oh, this patchset also (mostly) cures my pet hate for the >>last few months: VolanoMark on the NUMA. >> >>http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/w26/vmark.html >> >>The "average" plot for w26 I think is a little misleading because >>it got an unlucky result on the second last point making it look >>like its has a downward curve. It is usually more linear with a >>sharp downward spike at 150 rooms like the "maximum" plot. >> >>Don't ask me why it runs out of steam at 150 rooms. hackbench does >>something similar. I think it might be due to some resource running >>short, or a scalability problem somewhere else. >> > >i didn't had the time to apply the patches (w26 and C1 from ingo ) >on a vanilla t11, but i merged them with the wli-2,btw this one has really put >my box on steroids ;) . > You won't be able to merge mine with Ingo's. Which one put the box on steroids? :) > >none of them finished a hackbench 320 run, the OOM killed all of my >agetty's logging me out. the box is a 1way p4(HT) 1gb of ram >and no swap heh. > > > hackbench: > > sched-rollup-w26 sched-SMT-2.6.0-test11-C1 > > 50 4.839 50 5.200 > 100 9.415 100 10.090 > 150 14.469 150 14.764 > > > > time tar -xvjpf linux-2.6.0-test11.tar.bz2: > > sched-rollup-w26 sched-SMT-2.6.0-test11-C1 > > real 43.396 real 23.136 > ^^^^^^ > > user 27.608 user 20.700 > sys 4.039 sys 4.344 > Wonder whats going on here? Is this my patch vs Ingo's with nothing else applied? How does plain 2.6.0-test11 go? Thanks for testing.