Re: [CFT][RFC] HT scheduler

Kevin P. Fleming
2003-12-11T16:28:49Z

Nick Piggin wrote:

> http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/w26/
> Against 2.6.0-test11
>
> This includes the SMT description for P4. Initial results shows comparable
> performance to Ingo's shared runqueue's patch on a dual P4 Xeon.
>

Is there any value in testing/using this on a single CPU P4-HT system,
or is it only targeted at multi-CPU systems?