From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262051AbTLNOtm (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2003 09:49:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262055AbTLNOtm (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2003 09:49:42 -0500 Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com ([192.108.102.143]:34096 "EHLO smtp-send.myrealbox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262051AbTLNOtl (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2003 09:49:41 -0500 Message-ID: <3FDC794E.6050200@myrealbox.com> Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 06:53:02 -0800 From: walt Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031213 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux, Inc. (Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rob Landley wrote: > I suspect most people are going to ignore this message because it's so out > there and loopy, but I thought I'd address it because I think Andre is > serious... It's very difficult to tell, but I assumed he wasn't -- or that's he's run out of lithium again ;0) > ...I would have recommended that they use > FreeBSD, technical merit notwithstanding... Hmm. I think this kind of remark should be reserved for people who produce demonstrably inferior products at outrageously high prices and use FUD as their primary marketing strategy...