Re: RFC - tarball/patch server in BitKeeper

Andrea Arcangeli
2003-12-15T23:12:38Z

On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:44:38PM -0800, Tupshin Harper wrote:
> NO!!! In this case, you are not using bk, you are accessing information
> that is placed in a public place. If your argument were to hold any

that is what I meant with the "web" of course (not the web in the sense
of the world wide web at large), with the "web" I meant the bkbits.net
website of course.

> water, then people constrained from using bk due to any clause of the
> bkl could not access any information on bkbits.net. The mere act of
> pointing their browser there would be a violation. Since these people

correct.

> Either browsing bkbits.net is a use of bk and non-licensed people can't
> use it, or it is is not a use of bk and none of the bkl restrictions
> apply. Can't have it both ways.

agreed.