Re: RFC - tarball/patch server in BitKeeper

Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-15T15:55:50Z

--Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> wrote (on Monday, December 15, 2003 07:42:26 -0800):

> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:31:04PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>> One thing that I've wished for in the past which looks like it *might*
>> be trivial to do is to grab a raw version of the patch you already
>> put out in HTML format, eg if I surf down changesets and get to a page
>> like this:
>>
>> http://linus.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/patch@1.1522?nav=index.html|ChangeSet@-2w|cset@1.1522
>
> We can do that and we will, it's just not hit the top of the priority list.
> Given past discussions on this list I had thought there was a strong need
> for a way to trivially track any BK tree without BK, maybe I misunderstood
> what was being asked.

I suspect different people have different needs ;-)

> There isn't any reason we can't do both.

Thanks!

M.