From: Bob <recbo@nishanet.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Working nforce2, was Re: Fixes for nforce2 hard lockup, apic, io-apic, udma133 covered
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 01:07:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FDEA10E.4030503@nishanet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200312160254.45150.ross@datscreative.com.au>
Ross,
my_make_script nf2-800UL 2>&1 | tee /tmp/make.err
#/tmp/make.err
<snip>
CC arch/i386/kernel/apic.o
arch/i386/kernel/apic.c: In function `smp_apic_timer_interrupt':
arch/i386/kernel/apic.c:1105: warning: unsigned int format, long unsigned int arg (arg 2)
...which is around the printk line here--
printk("..APIC TIMER ack delay, reload:%u, safe:%u\n",
+ if(!passno) { /* calculate timing */
+ safecnt = apic_read(APIC_TMICT) -
+ ( (800UL * apic_read(APIC_TMICT) ) /
+ (1000000000UL/HZ) );
+ printk("..APIC TIMER ack delay, reload:%u, safe:%u\n",
+ apic_read(APIC_TMICT), safecnt);
+ passno++;
Here are the two patches with "#ifdef N" to "#if defined(N)" change
but not the unsigned int change --
diff -urN linux-2.6.0-test11/arch/i386/kernel/apic.c linux-2.6.0-test11-nf2/arch/i386/kernel/apic.c
--- linux-2.6.0-test11/arch/i386/kernel/apic.c 2003-11-26 15:46:07.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.0-test11-nf2/arch/i386/kernel/apic.c 2003-12-13 23:48:30.000000000 -0500
@@ -1089,6 +1089,37 @@
*/
irq_stat[cpu].apic_timer_irqs++;
+#if defined(CONFIG_MK7) && defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_AMD74XX)
+ /*
+ * on 2200XP & nforce2 chipset we need 600ns? 800? 1000? 1100?
+ * from timer irq start to apic irq ack to prevent
+ * hard lockups, use apic timer itself.
+ * C1 disconnect bit related. Ross Dickson.
+ */
+ {
+ static unsigned int passno, safecnt;
+ if(!passno) { /* calculate timing */
+ safecnt = apic_read(APIC_TMICT) -
+ ( (800UL * apic_read(APIC_TMICT) ) /
+ (1000000000UL/HZ) );
+ printk("..APIC TIMER ack delay, reload:%u, safe:%u\n",
+ apic_read(APIC_TMICT), safecnt);
+ passno++;
+ }
+#if APIC_DEBUG
+ if(passno<12) {
+ unsigned int at1 = apic_read(APIC_TMCCT);
+ if( passno > 1 )
+ Dprintk("..APIC TIMER ack delay, predelay count:%u \n", at1 );
+ passno++;
+ }
+#endif
+ /* delay only if required */
+ while( apic_read(APIC_TMCCT) > safecnt )
+ ndelay(100);
+ }
+#endif
+
/*
* NOTE! We'd better ACK the irq immediately,
* because timer handling can be slow.*/
diff -urN linux-2.6.0-test11/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c linux-2.6.0-test11-nf2/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c
--- linux-2.6.0-test11/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c 2003-11-26 15:43:32.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.0-test11-nf2/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c 2003-12-13 15:14:25.000000000 -0500
@@ -2128,6 +2128,54 @@
printk(KERN_ERR "..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC\n");
}
+#if defined (CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT) && (CONFIG_X86_UP_IOAPIC)
+ /* for nforce2 try vector 0 on pin0
+ * Note 8259a is already masked, also by default
+ * the io_apic_set_pci_routing call disables the 8259 irq 0
+ * so we must be connected directly to the 8254 timer if this works
+ * Note2: this violates the above comment re Subtle but works!
+ */
+ printk(KERN_INFO "..TIMER: Is timer irq0 connected to IOAPIC Pin0? ...\n");
+ if (pin1 != -1) {
+ extern spinlock_t i8259A_lock;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int tok, saved_timer_ack = timer_ack;
+ /*
+ * Ok, does IRQ0 through the IOAPIC work?
+ */
+ io_apic_set_pci_routing ( 0, 0, 0, 0, 0); /* connect pin */
+ unmask_IO_APIC_irq(0);
+ timer_ack = 0;
+
+ /*
+
+
+
+ * Ok, does IRQ0 through the IOAPIC work?
+ */
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&i8259A_lock, flags);
+ Dprintk("..TIMER check 8259 ints disabled, imr1:%02x, imr2:%02x\n", inb(0x21), inb(0xA1));
+ tok = timer_irq_works();
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i8259A_lock, flags);
+ if (tok) {
+ if (nmi_watchdog == NMI_IO_APIC) {
+ disable_8259A_irq(0);
+ setup_nmi();
+ enable_8259A_irq(0);
+ check_nmi_watchdog();
+ }
+ printk(KERN_INFO "..TIMER: works OK on apic pin0 irq0\n" );
+ return;
+ }
+ /* failed */
+ timer_ack = saved_timer_ack;
+ clear_IO_APIC_pin(0, 0);
+ io_apic_set_pci_routing ( 0, pin1, 0, 0, 0);
+ printk(KERN_ERR "..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC Pin 0\n");
+ }
+/* end new stuff for nforce2 */
+#endif
+
printk(KERN_INFO "...trying to set up timer (IRQ0) through the 8259A ... ");
if (pin2 != -1) {
printk("\n..... (found pin %d) ...", pin2);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-16 6:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-15 14:30 Fwd: Re: Working nforce2, was Re: Fixes for nforce2 hard lockup, apic, io-apic, udma133 covered Ross Dickson
2003-12-15 15:02 ` Craig Bradney
2003-12-15 15:56 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-12-15 16:54 ` Ross Dickson
2003-12-16 6:07 ` Bob [this message]
[not found] <200312132040.00875.ross@datscreative.com.au>
2003-12-13 12:00 ` Bob
2003-12-15 13:11 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-12-16 7:18 ` Bob
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-13 9:20 Ross Dickson
2003-12-13 9:51 ` Bob
2003-12-13 5:16 Ross Dickson
2003-12-13 6:04 ` Jesse Allen
2003-12-07 13:12 Ross Dickson
2003-12-11 6:55 ` Ross Dickson
2003-12-11 11:47 ` Ian Kumlien
2003-12-11 9:12 ` Ross Dickson
2003-12-11 17:52 ` Ian Kumlien
2003-12-11 18:21 ` Jesse Allen
2003-12-12 9:27 ` Bob
2003-12-12 16:59 ` Working nforce2, was " Jesse Allen
2003-12-12 17:18 ` Jesse Allen
2003-12-12 18:18 ` Josh McKinney
2003-12-12 19:29 ` Jesse Allen
2003-12-12 21:42 ` Craig Bradney
2003-12-13 4:18 ` Bob
2003-12-13 6:34 ` Bob
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FDEA10E.4030503@nishanet.com \
--to=recbo@nishanet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox