From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262030AbTLPSYV (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:24:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262040AbTLPSYV (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:24:21 -0500 Received: from wsip-68-14-236-254.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.14.236.254]:9358 "EHLO office.labsysgrp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262030AbTLPSYU (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:24:20 -0500 Message-ID: <3FDF4DCF.8090205@backtobasicsmgmt.com> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:24:15 -0700 From: "Kevin P. Fleming" Organization: Back to Basics Network Management User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030925 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shawn CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Mainboard on which X86_UP_IOAPIC works? (mine crashes hard) References: <1071597008.2115.23.camel@www.enodev.com> <3FDF47F0.7070409@backtobasicsmgmt.com> <1071598789.2115.31.camel@www.enodev.com> In-Reply-To: <1071598789.2115.31.camel@www.enodev.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Shawn wrote: > Would you postulate that since the KV7 is a KT600, that the Asus A7V600 > would also be "ok"? I ask because my local parts hole has the Asus and > not the Abit... I'd gamble and say probably yes, since the hardware is pretty much the same. I know that the BIOS can have some impact on this, though.