From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264385AbTLPXqJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:46:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264389AbTLPXqJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:46:09 -0500 Received: from smtp11.eresmas.com ([62.81.235.111]:24794 "EHLO smtp11.eresmas.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264385AbTLPXqH (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:46:07 -0500 Message-ID: <3FDF992D.9090802@wanadoo.es> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:45:49 +0100 From: Xose Vazquez Perez User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 X-Accept-Language: gl, es, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Jones , linux-kernel , pciids-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: pciids commit References: <3FDF973F.60309@wanadoo.es> <20031216234207.GA26061@redhat.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.63.3.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dave Jones wrote: > Assuming you mean a sync between pciids.sf.net & kernel, this is > unlikely to happen until post 2.6.0. Linus hasn't been taking > "this device wont work without this" type patches, which are IMHO > more important than ID updates, so I can't see him taking this either. I was talking about -> http://pciids.sourceforge.net , not the LiNUX kernel.