From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261775AbTLRHLy (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 02:11:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261863AbTLRHLy (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 02:11:54 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:28114 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261775AbTLRHLx (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 02:11:53 -0500 Message-ID: <3FE1532A.2010109@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 02:11:38 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Piggin CC: Joe Pranevich , linux-kernel , mingo@redhat.com Subject: Re: Wonderful World of Linux 2.6 - Final References: <3FE13D07.6080204@cyberone.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3FE13D07.6080204@cyberone.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nick Piggin wrote: > I'll just mention that the "Hyperthreading" section is not entirely > accurate: the process scheduler is blissfully unaware of HT / SMT > presently. It is a must fix item though, and there are a number of > different implementations available to solve this. Are you sure? I could have sworn Ingo made the scheduler magically HT-friendly... Jeff