From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265243AbTLRSNm (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:13:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265260AbTLRSNm (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:13:42 -0500 Received: from wsip-68-14-236-254.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.14.236.254]:20656 "EHLO office.labsysgrp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265243AbTLRSNl (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:13:41 -0500 Message-ID: <3FE1EE33.6090002@backtobasicsmgmt.com> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:13:07 -0700 From: "Kevin P. Fleming" Organization: Back to Basics Network Management User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030925 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: LKML Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.0 durability test using OSDL-DBT-3 References: <1071770839.12786.5.camel@ibm-a.pdx.osdl.net> In-Reply-To: <1071770839.12786.5.camel@ibm-a.pdx.osdl.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jenny Zhang wrote: > To test Linux 2.6.0 durability, we stressed the OS under OSDL-DBT-3 > workload for 14 days. It was released yesterday, how did you manage that?