From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265416AbTLRXpg (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:45:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265409AbTLRXpg (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:45:36 -0500 Received: from opersys.com ([64.40.108.71]:53262 "EHLO www.opersys.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265416AbTLRXpe (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:45:34 -0500 Message-ID: <3FE23CD1.4080802@opersys.com> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:48:33 -0500 From: Karim Yaghmour Reply-To: karim@opersys.com Organization: Opersys inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, fr, fr-be, fr-ca, fr-fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zwane Mwaikambo CC: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Updating real-time and nanokernel maintainers References: <3FE234E4.8020500@opersys.com> <3FE23966.7060001@opersys.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > But you're forgetting what the MAINTAINERS file is for. I can't but help > thinking that this is linked with the email you sent earlier, but that's > just me. Frankly i reckon this particular case could be settled by > removing both from MAINTAINERS as neither has code in the 2.6 linux > kernel. Anybody looking for realtime Linux kernel capabilities can just do > a Google. Yes, yes, and guess what shows up top on that google results list :) Seriously though, the final decision isn't mine. I've submitted the patch and I personally think that it's more than justfied. I'll leave it to the wisdom of the people in charge to make the appropriate decision. Karim -- Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits http://www.opersys.com || karim@opersys.com || 514-812-4145