From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262352AbTLSKuj (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 05:50:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262360AbTLSKuj (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 05:50:39 -0500 Received: from natsmtp01.rzone.de ([81.169.145.166]:12686 "EHLO natsmtp01.rzone.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262352AbTLSKuh (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 05:50:37 -0500 Message-ID: <3FE2D7F6.6030504@softhome.net> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:50:30 +0100 From: "Ihar 'Philips' Filipau" Organization: Home Sweet Home User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: William Lee Irwin III CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [OT] linux.bkbits.net References: <3FE2D4D5.2050103@softhome.net> <20031219104050.GK31393@holomorphy.com> In-Reply-To: <20031219104050.GK31393@holomorphy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:37:09AM +0100, Ihar 'Philips' Filipau wrote: > >> It is rather strange to 'bk pull http://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5' >>and to find in Makefile: >>VERSION = 2 >>PATCHLEVEL = 6 >>SUBLEVEL = 0 >>EXTRAVERSION = >> Or it is only me who finds this strange? >> When transition from 2.5 to 2.6 is planned? >> After all stable branch deserve to have NOT odd version number :) > > > You may have missed Linus' announcement: 2.6.0 has been released. > Yes. No. Br-r-r-r. I'm not about Linux kernel version. I'm about its name in BK :-) -- Ihar 'Philips' Filipau / with best regards from Saarbruecken. -- _ _ _ Because the kernel depends on it existing. "init" |_|*|_| literally _is_ special from a kernel standpoint, |_|_|*| because its' the "reaper of zombies" (and, may I add, |*|*|*| that would be a great name for a rock band). -- Linus Torvalds