From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262360AbTLSKuo (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 05:50:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262425AbTLSKun (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 05:50:43 -0500 Received: from adsl-67-114-19-185.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net ([67.114.19.185]:34975 "EHLO bastard.smallmerchant.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262360AbTLSKuk (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 05:50:40 -0500 Message-ID: <3FE2D7F7.9010703@tupshin.com> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 02:50:31 -0800 From: Tupshin Harper User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5a (20031216) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: William Lee Irwin III Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [OT] linux.bkbits.net References: <3FE2D4D5.2050103@softhome.net> <20031219104050.GK31393@holomorphy.com> In-Reply-To: <20031219104050.GK31393@holomorphy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org William Lee Irwin III wrote: >On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:37:09AM +0100, Ihar 'Philips' Filipau wrote: > > >> It is rather strange to 'bk pull http://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5' >>and to find in Makefile: >>VERSION = 2 >>PATCHLEVEL = 6 >>SUBLEVEL = 0 >>EXTRAVERSION = >> Or it is only me who finds this strange? >> When transition from 2.5 to 2.6 is planned? >> After all stable branch deserve to have NOT odd version number :) >> >> > >You may have missed Linus' announcement: 2.6.0 has been released. > > >-- wli > > Uh...no. He's talking about the fact that it is conceptually odd to pull a 2.6(final) linux from a 2.5 URL. That's all. -Tupshin