From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262569AbTLTOdD (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Dec 2003 09:33:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263158AbTLTOdD (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Dec 2003 09:33:03 -0500 Received: from mail-03.iinet.net.au ([203.59.3.35]:29387 "HELO mail.iinet.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262569AbTLTOdA (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Dec 2003 09:33:00 -0500 Message-ID: <3FE45D98.2080206@cyberone.com.au> Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 01:32:56 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030827 Debian/1.4-3 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched domains w27 for 2.6.0 References: <3FE31212.3020701@cyberone.com.au> <20031220114508.GA19417@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20031220114508.GA19417@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: >* Nick Piggin wrote: > > >>http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/w27/ >> >>This patch includes a lot of fixes, especially to the active balancing >>and HT code. It also addresses Rusty's suggestions, and will hopefully >>fix Zwane's interactivity problems. Testing, comments welcome. >> > >it's looking good so far - this was my final major conceptual peevee. >Active balancing is a pretty essential feature - i'm glad you carried >the concept over from my HT patch. It increases complexity, but it's >worth it. > You'll notice my earlier versions had some type of active balancing. It was very simple but too dumb, so yes I used ideas from your patch which seems to be giving good results.