From: Jean-Luc Fontaine <jfontain@free.fr>
To: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Subject: Re: IDE performance drop between 2.4.23 and 2.6.0
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 20:54:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FEDE389.4090103@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312270938130.14874@home.osdl.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Linus Torvalds wrote:
|
| On Sat, 27 Dec 2003, Jean-Luc Fontaine wrote:
|
|>I solved the problem in a very strange way. Note that the (b) disk
|>performance only improves after readahead has been increased on another
|>(c) drive! (the (c) drive performance was also increased by to 2.4
|>levels but is not shown here). I could reliably repeat this behavior
|>after rebooting.
|>
|>Can any IDE expert explain it?
|
|
| Looks like a bug. If you don't access hdc,
hdc is / for 2.6, whereas hdb is used for 2.4. So hdc was obviously
accessed prior to this test.
| then the read-ahead on hdc
| shouldn't matter. I wonder if the read-ahead code (either the setting or
| the reading) gets the value from the wrong queue or something.
Or could this set something in the VIA chipset? I'll take a look in
/proc/ide/via and report if needed.
Let me know if you need more tests to be run.
- --
Jean-Luc Fontaine mailto:jfontain@free.fr http://jfontain.free.fr/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/7eOIkG/MMvcT1qQRAjAxAKCr3xDbqELBzY7zsOYCQi/7QsYw7ACeObup
auyEo8bDPNHOD79+/I8/xPw=
=rsrt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-27 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-27 14:43 IDE performance drop between 2.4.23 and 2.6.0 Jean-Luc Fontaine
2003-12-27 17:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-27 19:54 ` Jean-Luc Fontaine [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-25 16:39 Max Payne
2003-12-25 18:25 ` Jean-Luc Fontaine
2003-12-25 13:56 Luis Miguel García
2003-12-25 14:35 ` Ed Sweetman
2003-12-25 20:35 ` Luis Miguel García
2003-12-25 5:20 Luis Miguel García
2003-12-24 9:27 Vid Strpic
2003-12-24 15:17 ` Gene Heskett
2003-12-24 17:24 ` Gordon Larsen
2003-12-23 12:42 Jean-Luc Fontaine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FEDE389.4090103@free.fr \
--to=jfontain@free.fr \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox