From: Samuel Flory <sflory@rackable.com>
To: Leon Toh <tltoh@attglobal.net>
Cc: Linux Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Adaptec/DPT I2O Option Omitted From Linux 2.6.0 Kernel Configuration Tool
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 16:15:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FEF721D.7020405@rackable.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.2.20031227093632.0229afe8@wheresmymailserver.com>
Leon Toh wrote:
> Merry Christmas Everyone,
>
> I just downloaded full source code of linux-2.6.0 to start doing some
> work and testing of Adaptec/DPT I2O controller's. This is when I happen
> to notice Adapec/DPT I2O option have been omitted from Linux Kernel
> 2.6.0 Configuration tool.
>
> Typically this option is located in *Device Drivers -> SCSI device
> support -> SCSI low-level drivers*. Furthermore it is also not listed in
> *Device Drivers -> I2O device support* also. And the driver source
> (dpti2o) is residing in /drivers/scsi.
>
> Please advice how should I than go about in hacking Linux 2.6.0 Kernel
> Configuration tool to include Adaptec/DPT I2O support ?
>
> Also any reason for the Adaptec/DPT I2O option being omitted out from
> Linux Kernel configuration tool ? Or is it just happen to be accidental
> ? Will this be option made available in the next release or pre-release
> of 2.6 kernel than ?
>
The DPT I2O driver was never converted to the new driver model. The
driver from what I can see is a mess. It doesn't even compile in 2.4
for a number of archs like amd64.
A while back a bunch of people (including myself) raised the concern
through various channels with adaptec. In theroy someone at adaptec is
working on it, but there was not an ETA.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-29 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-26 23:00 Adaptec/DPT I2O Option Omitted From Linux 2.6.0 Kernel Configuration Tool Leon Toh
2003-12-29 0:15 ` Samuel Flory [this message]
2003-12-29 10:16 ` Leon Toh
2003-12-29 11:40 ` David Lang
2003-12-30 5:15 ` Leon Toh
2003-12-29 18:25 ` Samuel Flory
2003-12-29 18:32 ` Samuel Flory
2003-12-30 3:32 ` Go Taniguchi
2003-12-30 23:02 ` Samuel Flory
2003-12-30 4:46 ` Leon Toh
[not found] <179fQ-1iK-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <17TiY-4Pm-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <182Fy-Lx-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <18ajG-4Lz-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <18jZB-4VF-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-12-30 5:19 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-02 0:08 ` Leon Toh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-30 22:42 Leon Toh
[not found] <19aKu-6Z-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <19aKu-6Z-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <19aKu-6Z-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <19aKu-6Z-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <19aKu-6Z-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <19aKu-6Z-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <19lcU-64y-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-01-02 2:02 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-02 22:36 ` Leon Toh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FEF721D.7020405@rackable.com \
--to=sflory@rackable.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tltoh@attglobal.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox