From: Samuel Flory <sflory@rackable.com>
To: Johannes Ruscheinski <ruschein@mail-infomine.ucr.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Best Low-cost IDE RAID Solution For 2.6.x? (OT?)
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 18:10:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FEF8CFD.7060502@rackable.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031228180424.GA16622@mail-infomine.ucr.edu>
Johannes Ruscheinski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're looking for a low-cost high-reliability IDE RAID solution that works well
> with the 2.6.x series of kernels. We have about 1 TB (8 disks) that we'd
> like to access in a non-redundant raid mode. Yes, I know, that lack of
> redundancy and high reliability are contradictory. Let's just say that
> currently we lack the funding to do anything else but we may be able to obtain
> more funding for our disk storage needs in the near future.
It really depends on what you mean by low cost? The ony ide raid
controller that does 8 PATA drives well under linux is the 3ware
controller. For SATA drives you have the 3ware, and adaptec controller.
In theroy the highpoint 8 port sata card would be a good canidate
for software raid, but highpoint has yet to cough up an open source
drive yet.
It you want to go the software raid route and have 2 spare pci solts.
You can go with either the high point rocket raid 454 (PATA), or the
promise SATA150 TX4.
I really don't recommend any of promise's cards that use use the i2o
driver, or any sort of binary only driver.
PS- Why not at least run software raid 5? It takes far less cpu than
you'd think, and can save your ass.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-29 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-28 18:04 Best Low-cost IDE RAID Solution For 2.6.x? (OT?) Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-28 18:50 ` Joel Jaeggli
2003-12-28 21:35 ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-28 21:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-12-28 22:14 ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-28 23:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-12-29 1:18 ` Wakko Warner
2003-12-28 21:56 ` bert hubert
2003-12-28 23:36 ` Joel Jaeggli
2004-01-07 23:28 ` bill davidsen
2003-12-29 2:10 ` Samuel Flory [this message]
2003-12-29 13:41 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-12-29 18:59 ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-29 19:04 ` Samuel Flory
2003-12-29 19:06 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-12-30 0:03 ` Wakko Warner
2003-12-30 6:54 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-12-30 14:41 ` Wakko Warner
2003-12-30 20:58 ` Samuel Flory
2004-01-07 23:35 ` bill davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FEF8CFD.7060502@rackable.com \
--to=sflory@rackable.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ruschein@mail-infomine.ucr.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox