public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Samuel Flory <sflory@rackable.com>
To: Johannes Ruscheinski <ruschein@mail-infomine.ucr.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Best Low-cost IDE RAID Solution For 2.6.x? (OT?)
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 18:10:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FEF8CFD.7060502@rackable.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031228180424.GA16622@mail-infomine.ucr.edu>

Johannes Ruscheinski wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> We're looking for a low-cost high-reliability IDE RAID solution that works well
> with the 2.6.x series of kernels.  We have about 1 TB (8 disks) that we'd
> like to access in a non-redundant raid mode.  Yes, I know, that lack of
> redundancy and high reliability are contradictory.  Let's just say that
> currently we lack the funding to do anything else but we may be able to obtain
> more funding for our disk storage needs in the near future.


   It really depends on what you mean by low cost?  The ony ide raid 
controller that does 8 PATA drives well under linux is the 3ware 
controller.  For SATA drives you have the 3ware, and adaptec controller. 
    In theroy the highpoint 8 port sata card would be a good canidate 
for software raid, but highpoint has yet to cough up an open source 
drive yet.

   It you want to go the software raid route and have 2 spare pci solts. 
  You can go with either the high point rocket raid 454 (PATA), or the 
promise SATA150 TX4.

   I really don't recommend any of promise's cards that use use the i2o 
driver, or any sort of binary only driver.

PS- Why not at least run software raid 5?  It takes far less cpu than 
you'd think, and can save your ass.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-12-29  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-28 18:04 Best Low-cost IDE RAID Solution For 2.6.x? (OT?) Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-28 18:50 ` Joel Jaeggli
2003-12-28 21:35   ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-28 21:45     ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-12-28 22:14       ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-28 23:05       ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-12-29  1:18         ` Wakko Warner
2003-12-28 21:56     ` bert hubert
2003-12-28 23:36     ` Joel Jaeggli
2004-01-07 23:28       ` bill davidsen
2003-12-29  2:10 ` Samuel Flory [this message]
2003-12-29 13:41   ` Tomas Szepe
2003-12-29 18:59     ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-29 19:04       ` Samuel Flory
2003-12-29 19:06         ` Tomas Szepe
2003-12-30  0:03         ` Wakko Warner
2003-12-30  6:54           ` Tomas Szepe
2003-12-30 14:41             ` Wakko Warner
2003-12-30 20:58               ` Samuel Flory
2004-01-07 23:35               ` bill davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3FEF8CFD.7060502@rackable.com \
    --to=sflory@rackable.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ruschein@mail-infomine.ucr.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox