From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265377AbTL2TMK (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2003 14:12:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265373AbTL2TMH (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2003 14:12:07 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:63617 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265398AbTL2TKD (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2003 14:10:03 -0500 Message-ID: <3FF07BF3.2090500@pobox.com> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 14:09:39 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Muli Ben-Yehuda CC: Linus Torvalds , Linux-Kernel , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [CFT/PATCH] give sound/oss/trident a holiday cleanup for 2.6 References: <20031229183846.GI13481@actcom.co.il> <20031229185627.GJ13481@actcom.co.il> In-Reply-To: <20031229185627.GJ13481@actcom.co.il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > You're 100% right. Internally, the patch I sent is composed of 30 > different patches. The reason I didn't seperate it into two patches is > that the changes were interleaved and inter-dependant and seperating > them was a b*tch. If Andrew wishes to include it in -mm or you wish to > include it in -vanilla and would like it in two seperate patches, I'll > go back and redo it that way. Thirty separate patches is OK. We have scripts to handle "patchbombs". Jeff