From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265742AbTL3McH (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 07:32:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265744AbTL3McH (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 07:32:07 -0500 Received: from kluizenaar.xs4all.nl ([213.84.184.247]:62359 "EHLO samwel.tk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265742AbTL3McG (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 07:32:06 -0500 Message-ID: <3FF1703D.8050909@samwel.tk> Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:31:57 +0100 From: Bart Samwel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031221 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kiko Piris CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Fwd: A couple of questions about laptop-mode for 2.6, version 4 References: <20031230092831.GA20414@sacarino.pirispons.net> <3FF15849.60005@samwel.tk> <20031230111408.GA22920@sacarino.pirispons.net> In-Reply-To: <20031230111408.GA22920@sacarino.pirispons.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Kiko Piris wrote: > Btw, have you had reliability reports? Do you know if it's going to be > included in 2.6 "official" tree shortly? I've gotten no reliability reports whatsoever, but nobody's complained. I've run it for a couple of days and it worked fine for me, so that give me some level of confidence. As for your second question: I have no clue, this is out of my hands. I'm not even sure if I have to do anything specific (like officially submitting to Linus or something) in order to have it included. Can anyone tell me how this is usually done? Bart