public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Samuel Flory <sflory@rackable.com>
To: Wakko Warner <wakko@animx.eu.org>
Cc: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Best Low-cost IDE RAID Solution For 2.6.x? (OT?)
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:58:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FF1E713.9050001@rackable.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031230094157.A7191@animx.eu.org>

Wakko Warner wrote:
>>>>nice about bad sectors as most hardware raid controllers.  On the other 
>>>>hand the md driver kicks the ass of nearly every raid controller I've tried.
>>>
>>>Faster than the mylex extreme raid 2000?  or one of the higher end adaptecs?
>>
>>Even faster than HP/Compaq cciss hwraid setups, yes.
> 
> 
> I've personally not had any experience with any hardware raid other than the
> mylex DAC960 family.
>

   I know a number of people that run their mylex cards in jbod mode and 
use software raid;-)


> One thing that keeps me from using the linux raid sw is the fact it can't be
> partitioned.  

   You're thinking of it the wrong way.  You just create a bunch of 
partitions and make them into raid devices.  You shouldn't be using the 
entire disk or you will break autodetection.

> I thought about lvm/evms, but I'm unwilling to make an initrd to
> set it up (mounting root).  Unfortunately boot loaders don't seem to support
> anything other than raid1. (Mostly lilo, but I'm not sure grub would do this
> either)
> 

   Lilo deals well with raid 1 devices.  I typical create a small raid 1 
mirror as /boot.  Just be sure to install your bootloader on to all 
drives.  Newer versions of lilo will do the right thing if told to use 
/dev/mdwhatever.

-- 
There is no such thing as obsolete hardware.
Merely hardware that other people don't want.
(The Second Rule of Hardware Acquisition)
Sam Flory  <sflory@rackable.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-30 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-28 18:04 Best Low-cost IDE RAID Solution For 2.6.x? (OT?) Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-28 18:50 ` Joel Jaeggli
2003-12-28 21:35   ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-28 21:45     ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-12-28 22:14       ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-28 23:05       ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-12-29  1:18         ` Wakko Warner
2003-12-28 21:56     ` bert hubert
2003-12-28 23:36     ` Joel Jaeggli
2004-01-07 23:28       ` bill davidsen
2003-12-29  2:10 ` Samuel Flory
2003-12-29 13:41   ` Tomas Szepe
2003-12-29 18:59     ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-29 19:04       ` Samuel Flory
2003-12-29 19:06         ` Tomas Szepe
2003-12-30  0:03         ` Wakko Warner
2003-12-30  6:54           ` Tomas Szepe
2003-12-30 14:41             ` Wakko Warner
2003-12-30 20:58               ` Samuel Flory [this message]
2004-01-07 23:35               ` bill davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3FF1E713.9050001@rackable.com \
    --to=sflory@rackable.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=szepe@pinerecords.com \
    --cc=wakko@animx.eu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox