public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob <recbo@nishanet.com>
To: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IDE-RAID Drive Performance
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 03:19:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FF5297E.6060802@nishanet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031230122119.1566247a@Genbox>

Nuno Alexandre wrote:

>On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:44:01 +0100 
>Mr(s): Nicklas Bondesson wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Hi!
>>
>>I think i'm getting really bad values from my disks. It's two Western
>>Digital WD800JB-00DUA3 (Special Edition 8 MB cache) disks connected to a
>>Promise TX2000 (PDC20271) card (RAID1 using ataraid under Linux 2.4.23).
>>
>>The disks are setup with hdparm at boot time:
>>
>>/sbin/hdparm -X69 -d1 -u1 -m16 -c3 /dev/hda 
>>/sbin/hdparm -X69 -d1 -u1 -m16 -c3 /dev/hdc
>>
>>When running hdparm -tT I get the following:
>>
>>/dev/hda:
>> Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  1.13 seconds =113.27 MB/sec
>> Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  2.46 seconds = 26.02 MB/sec
>>
>>/dev/hdc:
>> Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  1.13 seconds =113.27 MB/sec
>> Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  2.47 seconds = 25.91 MB/sec
>>
>>Are these normal values? I don't think so. Please advise.
>>
>>/Nicke
>>    
>>
>
>Hi.
>This is what i get with a Maxtor 6Y120L0 (2MB cache):
>
>/dev/hda:
> Timing buffer-cache reads:   1320 MB in  2.00 seconds = 659.44 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads:  140 MB in  3.02 seconds =  46.40 MB/sec
>
>Using:
>-d1 -u1 -m16 -c3 -W1 -A1 -k1 -X70 -a 8192
>
>I'm not using raid, its a single disk connected to IDE1 on the motherboard.
>
>Maybe you can try those parameters and see if it helps :)
>  
>
I have two promise cards and four Maxtor
DiamondMax Plus9 60G with 8MB cache each
hdparm -d1 -u1 -m16 -c1 -W1 -A1 -k1 -X70 -a 8192

and my raid0 is software, linux, not the promise chip's raid

on each drive I see 900 MB/s 47.2 MB/s
and on /dev/md/2 /tmp with four drives
four partitions I see 900 MB/s 94 MB/s

that's with 64k raid chunk, reiser 4096b blocks

Linux says 2048k raid chunk would minimize
seek time for better real world performance. It
doesn't work better with hdparm -tT but that's not
realworld. My version of reiserfs doesn't allow
changing the block size.

-Bob D

  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-02  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-30 10:44 IDE-RAID Drive Performance Nicklas Bondesson
2003-12-30 11:21 ` Nuno Alexandre
2004-01-02  8:19   ` Bob [this message]
2004-01-03 14:00   ` Andre Tomt
2004-01-03 15:58     ` Nicklas Bondesson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3FF5297E.6060802@nishanet.com \
    --to=recbo@nishanet.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox