From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265662AbUABVg1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2004 16:36:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265665AbUABVg0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2004 16:36:26 -0500 Received: from ns27.webmasters.com ([207.142.128.121]:50377 "HELO ns27.webmasters.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265662AbUABVgY (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2004 16:36:24 -0500 Message-ID: <3FF5E4CE.60606@is-cs.com> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:38:22 -0500 From: Steve Glines User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: file system technical comparisons Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm looking for a technical comparison between the major file systems. At a minimum I'd like to see a comparison between ext3, reiserfs, xfs and jfs. In the oh so perfect world I'd like to see detailed info on all supported file systems. Please CC or mail me directly as I am not a subscriber to this list. Thanks -- Steve Glines In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice, but in practice there is.