linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Waychison <Michael.Waychison@Sun.COM>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>,
	Mike Waychison <Michael.Waychison@Sun.COM>,
	autofs mailing list <autofs@linux.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [autofs] [RFC] Towards a Modern Autofs
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:41:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FFDB280.90504@sun.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FFD9498.6030905@zytor.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2726 bytes --]

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Ian Kent wrote:
> 
>>
>> If wildcard map entries are not in autofs v3 then Jeremy implemented this
>> in v4.
>>
> 
> v3 has had wildcard map entries and substitutions for a very, very, very 
> long time... it was a v2 feature, in fact.
> 
>> And yes the host map is basically a program map and that's all. Worse, as
>> pointed out in the paper it mounts everything under it. This is a source
>> of stress for mount and umount. I have put in a fair bit of time on ugly
>> hacks to work around this. This same problem is also evident in startup
>> and shutdown for master maps with a good number of entries (~50 or more).
>> A consequence of the current multiple daemon approach.
> 
> 
> This is why one wants to implement a mount tree with "direct mount 
> pads"; which also means keeping some state in the daemon.
> 
> For example, let's say one has a mount tree like:
> 
> /foo        server1:/export/foo \
> /foo/bar    server1:/export/bar \
> /bar        server2:/export/bar
> 
> ... then you actually have four diffenent filesystems involved: first, 
> some kind of "scaffolding" (this can be part of the autofs filesystem 
> itself or a ramfs) that hold the "foo" and "bar" directories, and then 
> foo, foo/bar, and bar.
> 
> Consider the following implementation: when one encounters the above, 
> the daemon stashes this away as an already-encountered map entry (in 
> case the map entries change, we don't want to be inconsistent), creates 
> a ramfs for the scaffolding, creates the "foo" and "bar" subdirectories 
> and mount-traps "foo" and "bar".  Then it releases userspace.  When it 
> encounters an access on "foo", it gets invoked again, looks it up in its 
> "partial mounts" state, then mounts "foo" and mount-traps "foo/bar", 
> then releases userspace.
> 
> In many ways this returns to the simplicity of the autofs v3 design 
> where the atomicity constraints where guaranteed by the VFS itself, *as 
> long as* mount traps can be atomically destroyed with umounting the 
> underlying filesystem.
> 

Great!

This is exactly what I found when looking into the situation.  However, 
namespaces still break automounting unless you can rid yourself of the 
daemon.  Move events into call_usermodehelper calls in current's 
namespace and maintain what little state you need as a set of tokens.


-- 
Mike Waychison
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
1 (650) 352-5299 voice
1 (416) 202-8336 voice
mailto: Michael.Waychison@Sun.COM
http://www.sun.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE:  The opinions expressed in this email are held by me,
and may not represent the views of Sun Microsystems, Inc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 251 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-08 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-06 19:55 [RFC] Towards a Modern Autofs Mike Waychison
2004-01-06 21:01 ` [autofs] " H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-06 21:44   ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-06 21:50   ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-06 22:06     ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-06 22:17       ` Tim Hockin
     [not found]       ` <20040106221502.GA7398@hockin.org>
2004-01-06 22:20         ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-07 16:19           ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-07 17:55             ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-07 21:13               ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-06 22:28       ` name spaces good (was: [autofs] [RFC] Towards a Modern Autofs) Dax Kelson
2004-01-06 22:48         ` name spaces good H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-07 21:14 ` [autofs] [RFC] Towards a Modern Autofs Jim Carter
2004-01-07 22:55   ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-08 12:00     ` Ian Kent
2004-01-08 15:39       ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 18:20         ` Ian Kent
2004-01-09 20:06           ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-10  5:43             ` Ian Kent
2004-01-12 13:07               ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-12 16:01                 ` raven
2004-01-12 16:26                   ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-12 22:50                     ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-12 23:28                       ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-13  1:30                       ` Ian Kent
2004-01-12 16:28                   ` raven
2004-01-12 16:58                     ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-13  1:54                       ` Ian Kent
2004-01-13 19:01                         ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-14 15:58                           ` raven
2004-01-13 18:46                   ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 20:51           ` Jim Carter
2004-01-10  5:56             ` Ian Kent
2004-01-08 17:34       ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-08 19:41         ` Mike Waychison [this message]
2004-01-08 23:42         ` Michael Clark
2004-01-09 20:28           ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 20:54             ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-09 21:43               ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 18:32         ` Ian Kent
2004-01-09 20:52           ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-10  6:05             ` Ian Kent
2004-01-08 12:29     ` Olivier Galibert
2004-01-08 13:20       ` Robin Rosenberg
2004-01-08 16:23       ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-08 12:35     ` Ian Kent
2004-01-08 13:08       ` Ian Kent
2004-01-08 18:20     ` Jim Carter
2004-01-08 21:01       ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-08  0:48   ` Ian Kent
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-06 22:28 Ogden, Aaron A.
2004-01-06 22:41 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-06 22:47 ` Tim Hockin
2004-01-06 22:53 ` Paul Raines
2004-01-07 23:14 ` Jim Carter
2004-01-07 23:32   ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-08 12:52     ` Ian Kent
2004-01-08 18:31       ` viro
2004-01-09 18:43         ` Ian Kent
2004-01-09 19:41         ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 19:57           ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-09 21:31             ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 21:36               ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-06 23:34 Ogden, Aaron A.
2004-01-06 23:47 ` Tim Hockin
     [not found] <1b5GC-29h-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <1b6CO-3v0-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-01-07  4:21   ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-07 17:50     ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-07 21:04       ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-07 21:11         ` Mike Fedyk
2004-01-07 23:40           ` Jesper Juhl
2004-01-07 21:24         ` Jeff Garzik
2004-01-07 23:47           ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-07 23:56             ` Jeff Garzik
2004-01-12 16:57               ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-13  7:39                 ` Ian Kent
2004-01-08 19:32 trond.myklebust
2004-01-08 19:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-08 20:08   ` trond.myklebust
2004-01-08 21:13     ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-08 22:20       ` J. Bruce Fields
2004-01-08 22:24         ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-09 20:37       ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 21:02         ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-09 21:52           ` Mike Waychison
2004-01-09 20:16   ` Mike Waychison

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3FFDB280.90504@sun.com \
    --to=michael.waychison@sun.com \
    --cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raven@themaw.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).