The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
To: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Bradley Morgan <include@grrlz.net>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fork: Honor task_struct's declared alignment
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 09:45:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a8cc92d-3e4c-4976-8b01-b303cab3061b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804064006.93930-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com>

On 8/4/26 08:40, Karl Mehltretter wrote:
> Since commit cb7ca40a3882 ("x86/fpu: Make task_struct::thread constant
> size"), struct task_struct is declared __attribute__((aligned(64))) on
> all architectures.
> 
> But fork_init() sets the task_struct slab cache's alignment to
> 
> 	align = max(L1_CACHE_BYTES, ARCH_MIN_TASKALIGN)
> 
> which is smaller than 64 on architectures whose cache lines are below
> 64 bytes: e.g. 32 on ARMv5.
> 
> In practice plain SLUB happens to hand out 64-byte-aligned objects
> anyway. With CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON the red-zone padding shifts objects
> to the requested alignment.
> 
> With CONFIG_UBSAN_ALIGNMENT=y a boot on QEMU versatilepb (ARM926EJ-S,
> v7.2-rc2, gcc 13.3) floods the console with reports like:
> 
>   UBSAN: misaligned-access in include/linux/sched.h:2087:9
>   member access within misaligned address c295d7e0 for type 'struct task_struct'
>   which requires 64 byte alignment
>   CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 15 Comm: pr/ttyAMA-1 Not tainted 7.2.0-rc2 #1 VOLUNTARY
> 
> Set the slab alignment to at least the type's declared alignment.
> Replace the hardcoded L1_CACHE_BYTES with SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN so the
> allocator applies cache_line_size(). On x86, arm and arm64 that is the
> cache line size of the booted CPU. Everywhere else it falls back to
> L1_CACHE_BYTES and nothing changes. ARCH_MIN_TASKALIGN (e.g. 4096 with
> x86 VSMP) still applies through the explicit align argument.
> 
> Fixes: cb7ca40a3882 ("x86/fpu: Make task_struct::thread constant size")
> Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>

Thanks but I suggested only SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, not the whole thing :) Can
be removed when a maintainer applies this.

> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5
> Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>

> ---
> 
> Notes (format-patch):
>     v2:
>      - fold in Vlastimil's suggestion: let SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN replace the
>        hardcoded L1_CACHE_BYTES
>     v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260710123957.31774-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com/
> 
>  kernel/fork.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index f0e2e131a9a5..3a0093efb29f 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -857,14 +857,15 @@ void __init fork_init(void)
>  #ifndef ARCH_MIN_TASKALIGN
>  #define ARCH_MIN_TASKALIGN	0
>  #endif
> -	int align = max_t(int, L1_CACHE_BYTES, ARCH_MIN_TASKALIGN);
> +	int align = max(ARCH_MIN_TASKALIGN,
> +			__alignof__(struct task_struct));
>  	unsigned long useroffset, usersize;
>  
>  	/* create a slab on which task_structs can be allocated */
>  	task_struct_whitelist(&useroffset, &usersize);
>  	task_struct_cachep = kmem_cache_create_usercopy("task_struct",
>  			arch_task_struct_size, align,
> -			SLAB_PANIC|SLAB_ACCOUNT,
> +			SLAB_PANIC|SLAB_ACCOUNT|SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN,
>  			useroffset, usersize, NULL);
>  
>  	/* do the arch specific task caches init */
> 
> base-commit: af5e34a41cd607c00ef752e00331736570992354


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-04  7:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-04  6:40 [PATCH v2] fork: Honor task_struct's declared alignment Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-04  7:22 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-08-04  7:45 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) [this message]
2026-08-04 18:03   ` Karl Mehltretter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3a8cc92d-3e4c-4976-8b01-b303cab3061b@kernel.org \
    --to=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=include@grrlz.net \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox