Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Ad-hoc cleanups and refactoring

[Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>]

Am 04.05.26 um 08:58 schrieb Andy Shevchenko:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 06:26:34PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 01:41:43PM +0000, Josua Mayer wrote:
>>> Am 27.04.26 um 15:34 schrieb Andy Shevchenko:
>>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 11:09:48AM +0000, Josua Mayer wrote:
>>>>> Am 14.04.26 um 20:43 schrieb Andy Shevchenko:
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 09:27:26PM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> ...
>
>>>>> For unknown reason your patch-set did not arrive in my inbox.
>>>>> Perhaps it went missing for others, too?
>>>> Are you in the MAINTAINERS for this part of the kernel?
>>>> The CAN NETWORK DRIVERS and GENERIC PHY FRAMEWORK do not list your name.
>>> Correct. I touched can phy once related to mux only.
>>>> If you think of mail delivery in general, it's delivered at least to the ML
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260317203001.2108568-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/
>>>>
>>>> TBH I don't know what to answer to your question as I don't know your expectations and
>>>> how it should be fulfilled taking into account my above question...
>>> Changelog v2:
>>> - Cc'ed to Ulf and Josua due to above
>>>
>>> This is why I expected it in my inbox.
>>> Usually in this situation I blame my provider.
>> Ah, blame me then. I most likely missed to add your name to the Cc list.
> Hmm... I have checked and your address is in the Cc for the whole series,
> so I withdraw that I admit earlier that problem is on my side. Please, check
> if everything fine on yours. Note, I'm about to send a v3.
Received v3, thanks!
>
>>>> But thanks for the reviewing! I will address the commit message in v3.
>>> Great!
>> And will try hard to make sure your address will be in the Cc list.