public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	<lcherian@marvell.com>, <bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com>,
	<tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	"Xin Hao" <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>, <xingxin.hx@openanolis.org>,
	<baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/21] x86/resctrl: Abstract and use supports_mba_mbps()
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 09:42:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b19ca17-e56c-0be3-f14d-d5485c5fb020@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220622164629.20795-8-james.morse@arm.com>

Hi James,

On 6/22/2022 9:46 AM, James Morse wrote:

...

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index b32ceff8325a..49d9e2c3c743 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -1890,17 +1890,26 @@ void rdt_domain_reconfigure_cdp(struct rdt_resource *r)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * Enable or disable the MBA software controller
> - * which helps user specify bandwidth in MBps.
>   * MBA software controller is supported only if
>   * MBM is supported and MBA is in linear scale.
>   */
> +static bool supports_mba_mbps(void)
> +{
> +	struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA].r_resctrl;
> +
> +	return (is_mbm_enabled() &&
> +		r->alloc_capable && is_mba_linear());
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Enable or disable the MBA software controller
> + * which helps user specify bandwidth in MBps.
> + */
>  static int set_mba_sc(bool mba_sc)
>  {
>  	struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA].r_resctrl;
>  
> -	if (!is_mbm_enabled() || !is_mba_linear() ||
> -	    mba_sc == is_mba_sc(r))
> +	if (!supports_mba_mbps() || mba_sc == is_mba_sc(r))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	r->membw.mba_sc = mba_sc;


It seems that this change is propagating an issue that exists
in the current implementation (not introduced by this work).

The supports_mba_mbps() test uses is_mbm_enabled() which is:
	(is_mbm_total_enabled() || is_mbm_local_enabled())

That is not accurate since the software controller is only called
when MBM local is enabled:
	mbm_update()
	{
		...
		if (is_mbm_local_enabled()) {
			...
			if (is_mba_sc(NULL))
				mbm_bw_count(rmid, &rr);
		}
	}
			

Could the "is_mbm_enabled()" in the new supports_mba_mbps() introduced
here be changed to use "is_mbm_local_enabled()" instead? It does not seem
an issue for existing hardware (that supports total and local) but
the kernel parameters do enable users to boot with "rdt=!mbmlocal" to
trigger problematic scenarios.

Reinette

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-23 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-22 16:46 [PATCH v5 00/21] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() return values in bytes James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 01/21] x86/resctrl: Kill off alloc_enabled James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 02/21] x86/resctrl: Merge mon_capable and mon_enabled James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 03/21] x86/resctrl: Add domain online callback for resctrl work James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 04/21] x86/resctrl: Group struct rdt_hw_domain cleanup James Morse
2022-06-29  8:33   ` tan.shaopeng
2022-06-29 11:07     ` James Morse
2022-07-01  6:37       ` tan.shaopeng
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 05/21] x86/resctrl: Add domain offline callback for resctrl work James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 06/21] x86/resctrl: Remove set_mba_sc()s control array re-initialisation James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 07/21] x86/resctrl: Abstract and use supports_mba_mbps() James Morse
2022-08-23 16:42   ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 08/21] x86/resctrl: Create mba_sc configuration in the rdt_domain James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 09/21] x86/resctrl: Switch over to the resctrl mbps_val list James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 10/21] x86/resctrl: Remove architecture copy of mbps_val James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 11/21] x86/resctrl: Allow update_mba_bw() to update controls directly James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 12/21] x86/resctrl: Calculate bandwidth from the previous __mon_event_count() chunks James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 13/21] x86/resctrl: Add per-rmid arch private storage for overflow and chunks James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 14/21] x86/resctrl: Allow per-rmid arch private storage to be reset James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 15/21] x86/resctrl: Abstract __rmid_read() James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 16/21] x86/resctrl: Pass the required parameters into resctrl_arch_rmid_read() James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 17/21] x86/resctrl: Move mbm_overflow_count() " James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 18/21] x86/resctrl: Move get_corrected_mbm_count() " James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 19/21] x86/resctrl: Rename and change the units of resctrl_cqm_threshold James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 20/21] x86/resctrl: Add resctrl_rmid_realloc_limit to abstract x86's boot_cpu_data James Morse
2022-06-22 16:46 ` [PATCH v5 21/21] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() return values in bytes James Morse
2022-07-03 15:54 ` [PATCH v5 00/21] " Xin Hao
2022-08-23 17:09   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-09-07  5:46     ` haoxin
2022-09-08 17:01       ` James Morse
2022-08-23 17:20 ` Reinette Chatre
2022-09-02 15:47   ` James Morse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3b19ca17-e56c-0be3-f14d-d5485c5fb020@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=xingxin.hx@openanolis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox