From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:46:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:46:47 -0400 Received: from otter.mbay.net ([206.40.79.2]:11022 "EHLO otter.mbay.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:46:32 -0400 From: jalvo@mbay.net (John Alvord) To: Derek Glidden Cc: Alexander Viro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Break 2.4 VM in five easy steps Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 15:46:17 GMT Message-ID: <3b204fe5.4014698@mail.mbay.net> In-Reply-To: <3B1E4CD0.D16F58A8@illusionary.com> In-Reply-To: <3B1E4CD0.D16F58A8@illusionary.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 06 Jun 2001 11:31:28 -0400, Derek Glidden wrote: > >I'm beginning to be amazed at the Linux VM hackers' attitudes regarding >this problem. I expect this sort of behaviour from academics - ignoring >real actual problems being reported by real actual people really and >actually experiencing and reporting them because "technically" or >"theoretically" they "shouldn't be an issue" or because "the "literature >[documentation] says otherwise - but not from this group. There have been multiple comments that a fix for the problem is forthcoming. Is there some reason you have to keep talking about it? John alvord