public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>,
	"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
	Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Cc: "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK"
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Cache a pointer to policy in cpudata
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:22:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3bd7acde-a4ea-42d6-8e75-bf17e6a4f143@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2877ad66-0148-483e-83b3-fab5da5dbe1f@kernel.org>

On 2/12/2025 12:47 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> On 2/11/2025 07:13, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
>> On 2/7/2025 3:26 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>>>
>>> In order to access the policy from a notification block it will
>>> need to be stored in cpudata.
>>
>> This might break the cpufreq_policy ref counting right?, if we cache the pointer
>> and use it independent of the ref counting framework.
> 
> Would it be reasonable to bump the ref count when we take the pointer?
> 
> I'm not sure if this will work properly.

One doubt, why cant we get the policy ref normally using the cpufreq_cpu_get(cpudata->cpu) 
in the notification block ? I'm not aware of that code, if there is any restriction on this.

> 
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 13 +++++++------
>>>   drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.h |  3 ++-
>>>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
>>> index 689de385d06da..5945b6c7f7e56 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
>>> @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static int amd_pstate_set_energy_pref_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>>>       else
>>>           epp = epp_values[pref_index];
>>>   -    if (epp > 0 && cpudata->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE) {
>>> +    if (epp > 0 && policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE) {
>>>           pr_debug("EPP cannot be set under performance policy\n");
>>>           return -EBUSY;
>>>       }
>>> @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_update_min_max_limit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>>>       perf.max_limit_perf = freq_to_perf(perf, cpudata->nominal_freq, policy->max);
>>>       perf.min_limit_perf = freq_to_perf(perf, cpudata->nominal_freq, policy->min);
>>>   -    if (cpudata->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE)
>>> +    if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE)
>>>           perf.min_limit_perf = min(perf.nominal_perf, perf.max_limit_perf);
>>>         WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->perf, perf);
>>> @@ -1042,6 +1042,7 @@ static int amd_pstate_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>>>           return -ENOMEM;
>>>         cpudata->cpu = policy->cpu;
>>> +    cpudata->policy = policy;
>>>         mutex_init(&cpudata->lock);
>>>       guard(mutex)(&cpudata->lock);
>>> @@ -1224,9 +1225,8 @@ static ssize_t show_energy_performance_available_preferences(
>>>   {
>>>       int i = 0;
>>>       int offset = 0;
>>> -    struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = policy->driver_data;
>>>   -    if (cpudata->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE)
>>> +    if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE)
>>>           return sysfs_emit_at(buf, offset, "%s\n",
>>>                   energy_perf_strings[EPP_INDEX_PERFORMANCE]);
>>>   @@ -1543,6 +1543,7 @@ static int amd_pstate_epp_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>>>           return -ENOMEM;
>>>         cpudata->cpu = policy->cpu;
>>> +    cpudata->policy = policy;
>>>         mutex_init(&cpudata->lock);
>>>       guard(mutex)(&cpudata->lock);
>>> @@ -1632,7 +1633,7 @@ static int amd_pstate_epp_update_limit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>>>         amd_pstate_update_min_max_limit(policy);
>>>   -    if (cpudata->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE)
>>> +    if (policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE)
>>>           epp = 0;
>>>       else
>>>           epp = READ_ONCE(cpudata->epp_cached);
>>> @@ -1651,7 +1652,7 @@ static int amd_pstate_epp_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>>>       if (!policy->cpuinfo.max_freq)
>>>           return -ENODEV;
>>>   -    cpudata->policy = policy->policy;
>>> +    cpudata->policy = policy;
>>>         ret = amd_pstate_epp_update_limit(policy);
>>>       if (ret)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.h b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.h
>>> index 7501d30db9953..16ce631a6c3d5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.h
>>> @@ -97,9 +97,10 @@ struct amd_cpudata {
>>>         struct mutex    lock;
>>>   +    struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>>> +
>>>       /* EPP feature related attributes*/
>>>       u8    epp_cached;
>>> -    u32    policy;
>>>       bool    suspended;
>>>       u8    epp_default;
>>>   };
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-12  3:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-06 21:56 [PATCH 00/14] amd-pstate cleanups Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 01/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Show a warning when a CPU fails to setup Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 11:59   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-10 13:50     ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-10 15:13       ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 02/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop min and max cached frequencies Mario Limonciello
2025-02-07 10:44   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-07 16:15     ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 03/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move perf values into a union Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 13:38   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-11 22:14     ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-12  6:31       ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-12 22:03         ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 04/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Overhaul locking Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11  5:02   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-11 21:54     ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-12  5:15       ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-12 22:05         ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 05/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop `cppc_cap1_cached` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11  5:46   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 06/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Use _free macro to free put policy Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11  5:58   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 07/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Replace all AMD_CPPC_* macros with masks Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11  6:16   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-11 18:31     ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 08/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Cache CPPC request in shared mem case too Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11  9:18   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 09/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move all EPP tracing into *_update_perf and *_set_epp functions Mario Limonciello
2025-02-12  6:39   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 10/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Update cppc_req_cached for shared mem EPP writes Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 13:01   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 11/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop debug statements for policy setting Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 13:03   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 12/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Cache a pointer to policy in cpudata Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 13:13   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-11 19:17     ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-12  3:52       ` Dhananjay Ugwekar [this message]
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 13/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Rework CPPC enabling Mario Limonciello
2025-02-13  4:42   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 14/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Stop caching EPP Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 13:27   ` Dhananjay Ugwekar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3bd7acde-a4ea-42d6-8e75-bf17e6a4f143@amd.com \
    --to=dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
    --cc=superm1@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox