Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Put SCSI host after remove it

[cang@codeaurora.org]

On 2019-12-16 11:12, cang@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2019-12-16 10:39, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 2019-12-15 17:34, cang@codeaurora.org wrote:
>>> This is applied to 5.5/scsi-queue. The two changes I patsed from you 
>>> are
>>> not merged yet, I am still doing code review to them, so there is no
>>> blk_cleanup_queue() calls in my code base. I am just saying you may 
>>> move
>>> your blk_cleanup_queue() calls below cancel_work_sync(&hba->eh_work) 
>>> if
>>> my change applies. How do you think?
>>> 
>>> scsi_host_put() was there before but explicitly removed by
>>> afa3dfd42d205b106787476647735aa1de1a5d02. I agree with you, without 
>>> this
>>> change, there is memory leak.
>> 
>> Hi Can,
>> 
>> Since your patch restores a call that was removed earlier, please
>> consider adding a Fixes: tag to your patch.
>> 
>> Please also have a look at
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git/log/?h=5.6/scsi-queue.
>> As one can see my patches that introduce blk_cleanup_queue() and
>> blk_mq_free_tag_set() calls have already been queued on Martin's
>> 5.6/scsi-queue branch.
>> 
>> Bart.
> 
> Hi Bart,
> 
> Sure, I will add the Fixes tag and rebase my changes. How about the 
> logic
> part of this change? Does it look good to you?
> 
> Sorry I was not aware of that your changes have been applied to 
> 5.6/scsi-queue.
> I am still trying to get it tested on my setups...
> Anyways, aside of hba->cmd_queue, tearing down hba->tmf_queue before
> scsi_remove_host() may be problem too. Requests can still be
> sent before and during scsi_remove_host(). If a request timed out,
> task abort will be invoked to abort the request, during which
> hba->tmf_queue is expected to be present. Please correct me if I am 
> wrong.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Can Guo.

Hi Bart

Just found that I should also remove the ufshcd_dealloc_host() called
in ufshcd_pci_remove() to make sure the deallocation is only handled by
ufshcd_remove().

Thanks,

Can Guo.