Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] iommu: Add device fault reporting API

[Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>]

On 03/06/2019 22:59, Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Mon,  3 Jun 2019 15:57:45 +0100
> Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com> wrote:
> 
>> Allow device drivers and VFIO to get notified on IOMMU translation
>> fault, and handle recoverable faults (PCI PRI). Several series require
>> this API (Intel VT-d and Arm SMMUv3 nested support, as well as the
>> generic host SVA implementation).
>>
>> Changes since v1 [1]:
>> * Allocate iommu_param earlier, in iommu_probe_device().
>> * Pass struct iommu_fault to fault handlers, instead of the
>>   iommu_fault_event wrapper.
>> * Removed unused iommu_fault_event::iommu_private.
>> * Removed unnecessary iommu_page_response::addr.
>> * Added iommu_page_response::version, which would allow to introduce a
>>   new incompatible iommu_page_response structure (as opposed to just
>>   adding a flag + field).
>>
>> [1] [PATCH 0/4] iommu: Add device fault reporting API
>>     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190523180613.55049-1-jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com/
>>
>> Jacob Pan (3):
>>   driver core: Add per device iommu param
>>   iommu: Introduce device fault data
>>   iommu: Introduce device fault report API
>>
>> Jean-Philippe Brucker (1):
>>   iommu: Add recoverable fault reporting
>>
> This interface meet the need for vt-d, just one more comment on 2/4. Do
> you want to add Co-developed-by you for the three patches from me?

I'm fine without it, I don't think it adds much to the Signed-off-by,
which is required

Thanks,
Jean