From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoyd@nvidia.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
<linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<syzbot+a16fb0cce329a320661c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ovl: keep merged and impure readdir caches separate
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 20:27:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d6a1a50-5937-47f8-9910-cae66ffab6ee@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxh-1J2OBjnDVbrrrjy1puSOW0kABvghN85ih6dtKUBTyA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Amir,
On 11.05.26 23:54, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> Hi Nirmoy,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 8:21 AM Nirmoy Das <nirmoyd@nvidia.com> wrote:
>> Overlayfs uses one inode cache slot for two readdir cache users with
>> different lifetime rules. Merged directory iteration pins the cache from
>> open directory files with cache->refcount. Impure real-directory iteration
>> uses the inode cache as an unrefcounted lookup table.
>>
>> Those caches cannot be reused interchangeably. If merged iteration finds
>> an impure cache in the inode slot, it can pin and seek through a cache
>> that was not built for merged iteration. If impure iteration finds a merged
>> cache, it can walk an object whose lifetime is controlled by open directory
>> files. Either direction can leave ovl_iterate() using stale cache entries.
>>
>> Add ovl_dir_cache_drop() to detach the inode cache before freeing it. Keep
>> refcounted merged caches alive until ovl_cache_put(), stop publishing new
>> merged caches through the inode slot,
> This is unacceptable - invalidating merged dir cache to paper over
> another root bug, which was not really fixed.
>
>> and let impure iteration reuse only
>> unrefcounted caches.
> All those guards are nice, but how does a directory inode change from
> being merged to impure or vice versa?
> This should never happen.
>
> It took a lot of arguing with Sonnet about wrong leads to find the real bug.
>
> Real bug was introduced by:
> b79e05aaa1667 ("ovl: no direct iteration for dir with origin xattr")
>
> It changed the test from:
>
> od->is_real = !OVL_TYPE_MERGE(type);
> od->is_upper = OVL_TYPE_UPPER(type);
>
> to:
>
> od->is_real = !ovl_test_flag(OVL_WHITEOUTS, d_inode(dir));
> od->is_upper = OVL_TYPE_UPPER(type);
>
> But there is a race window in copy up of a directory where
> upper is set and published before the OVL_WHITEOUTS flag
> is set.
>
> an opendir() observing this state inside the race window will
> wrongly start to iterate_real and another opendir later will
> observe the flag and start iterate_merged - boom!
>
> Attached is what I think is a correct fix.
> WDYT?
This looks correct with my limited understanding of the overlay code. I
still see the issue when running with
the syzkaller-derived C reproducer in a loop inside an arm64 virtme/qemu
VM with a KASAN/debug kernel.
Let me try to debug it more and get back.
Regards,
Nirmoy
>
> Thanks,
> Amir.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 6:20 [RFC PATCH] ovl: keep merged and impure readdir caches separate Nirmoy Das
2026-05-11 20:54 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-05-12 18:27 ` Nirmoy Das [this message]
2026-05-12 19:21 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d6a1a50-5937-47f8-9910-cae66ffab6ee@nvidia.com \
--to=nirmoyd@nvidia.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=syzbot+a16fb0cce329a320661c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox