From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261841AbVGUSuD (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:50:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261844AbVGUSuD (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:50:03 -0400 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.204]:41599 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261841AbVGUSuA convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:50:00 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WpZdUzCB56q+O+0HVkobS/0Xwfj/ihameQncMxBteGo+ifaar/s5iYHGXZPuHLJjKY47qcG4rvTs52fN5GiVMDwltbouBbP+AJvsyrfLXyzQLdK69dg/IguaIJfmfsbLKoPLfrQdIZzOtoIOsIKz48jUVK81JMKvkx+uLlSYZAs= Message-ID: <3d8471ca05072111494b45ffe8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:49:59 +0200 From: Guillaume Chazarain Reply-To: Guillaume Chazarain To: Voluspa Subject: Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050721200448.5c4a2ea0.lista1@telia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050721200448.5c4a2ea0.lista1@telia.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2005/7/21, Voluspa : > > 2h48m at 100 HZ > 2h48m at 250 HZ > 2h47m at 1000 HZ Now, what would be interesting is to see if the lack of differences comes from the fact that the processor has enough time to sleep, not enough time, or simply it does not matter. That is, is it a best case or a worst case ? > #!/bin/sh > touch time-hz-start > while (true) do > touch time-hz-end > sleep 1m > done Why this ? Why not simply nothing ? A computer can be idle for more than 1 minute ;-) -- Guillaume