Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference

Guillaume Chazarain
2005-07-21T18:50:03Z

2005/7/21, Voluspa <lista1@telia.com>:
>
> 2h48m at 100 HZ
> 2h48m at 250 HZ
> 2h47m at 1000 HZ

Now, what would be interesting is to see if the lack of differences
comes from the fact that the processor has enough time to sleep,
not enough time, or simply it does not matter.

That is, is it a best case or a worst case ?

> #!/bin/sh
> touch time-hz-start
> while (true) do
> touch time-hz-end
> sleep 1m
> done

Why this ?
Why not simply nothing ?
A computer can be idle for more than 1 minute ;-)

--
Guillaume