From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1755185AbcIFD2p (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 5 Sep 2016 23:28:45 -0400
Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:62090 "EHLO mout.web.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1753565AbcIFD2i (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 5 Sep 2016 23:28:38 -0400
Subject: Re: ACPI-video: Fine-tuning for several function implementations
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net>
 <897ebf36-2fe5-e109-adf6-b81b6e863d9a@users.sourceforge.net>
 <CAJZ5v0hug9QfZHQosCFFXEcFMsDd=YvXkqMmQya3RSqmOnY4dg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <3e0cdc5b-fd15-515a-82f2-2f44792664ed@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 05:28:01 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0hug9QfZHQosCFFXEcFMsDd=YvXkqMmQya3RSqmOnY4dg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:pE4+pzarpsugOIKgU7wsTdEvymsgs6hr0Pj6lenTQxsNvt1VWoe
 YFTX42ZrxZaOXxKx/zwWK5Ta6BiWZQpLXq5e/2yX8wQ7RZnXxaIM0kG5QZTt6DifUyoYmjo
 gGwrdTWI6fWiR8/Zi8vG7wy15F/KIy4ULGR7P9ihLeveX2zZNWqMrU2UrTxtsRXl0bCSWe7
 7vDOIRd3k3c9iymw6lWAA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:a86AJ+Q3a4Q=:MTQoDMwF8xBFx94EVp3PEx
 y1enVpCyLq8S9DWNMyDCFJQhUvjjOyLqzb8SIAJSRYI0KZS1tErW+0TE0hRSzMOrER5/R99di
 xojE1J60Qdz1yMOvGcbfHbAS2XyY06aljFUmIGNsmfrkhC/5ZbeLUXAKiZNfLfOLOzJ+lTboY
 V/DYz+fAOXqzzUZwaGhzCbdZIViigXOkPFX6daKS+HLDk4EEwvZgR3gvO32T+0R0uTJzsFs7S
 Q0NPPFPaAcv2ESLE5yDggL35966dC1XGL1gxQcK9Nya92B06F0BgQSZhY+B2ySn173AUQRXRa
 z8L9qMvJH1MmRhv8c2Ec18uLBwOxGKZCP+ZjcOkyDygPqEoAJW8IgJ1FrB6YosCuA7CWHFwnh
 Aoy2mncD27ZIOtiBqjTJ7jEd902AAfQzpu6VSIhBadDnGBbcYcpKDjQRPJhSnebHYdu9UnEHs
 br+7JwpTgOdlqabKUJm2SYvUv6t3XBL7w5OsbYJ/GqEbZCvXEhxPHfzdW408uL/xMI59o6xaR
 QgIVnvzUWW8bK8VUhCtUXSHWZSTMSVm3Y7NNcNzqgDBEfVmXJN7kllWLhrnecH3+eLmflpP/Y
 ew1PAVAifd0hb38s6ke1GZTJb6UqJxP4bBfOUuvJaXwSB1gy/wpv+8/VhlxiJnBbMM7lqfl6/
 y6IpRkkAH7ss9ZbsqqnBOyNvL65x2euTAFsE5ePRctToYZjma+hmYo200uEWx4mfhcDOqejYD
 QiFQ6BcefJhkDkUraLNyekGt2qKbyh03zFhPkA0OHEj8r7vncBKYCipyq5fEYa6r/mT84eUkJ
 5vY7tvA
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> I'd prefer this to be combined into fewer patches
> that each will address several issues of one type,

I understand your concern a bit in principle.


> ie. put all label renames into one patch,

Are any of my update suggestions controversial here?


> all size determination improvements into another one and so on.

I am unsure about the acceptance for the selected software change opportunities.
So I chose a very specific patch granularity intentionally.

I tend to provide some change ideas for each affected function
implementation individually. I imagine that this way should support
the recombination of update steps to some degree already, shouldn't it?

Regards,
Markus