From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937384AbdLRRcu (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:32:50 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:50238 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935038AbdLRRcn (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:32:43 -0500 Subject: Re: tps65090-charger: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in two functions To: Sebastian Reichel , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Julia Lawall , Joe Perches , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org References: <1513450432.4647.47.camel@perches.com> <4beb0d2e-adf6-5eeb-43c7-7829d54c6656@users.sourceforge.net> <20171218172404.3nqyza4ml5oofykn@earth> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <3e6fa357-091c-32bd-7680-bb75084469f5@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 18:32:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171218172404.3nqyza4ml5oofykn@earth> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:S/msiZLtUvbOnuigYVIiwfbBuSRKsVw17tIue7HH0m50A9J1QHA cJ7zv8YER1zzDtugDZLl0rq/NO3UW7jZkzAuqExMSLr+qsX1ClUDYwC5YXZqttMSDbYxGXZ 6L4eUBVCITuic1/V35XCPBxztb7OLiLCXttTHJHzt1ukBvW2wzZSUsQ8BmIaHrq359yif4Y EoqACzPf2eXgpbZYg4LHw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:4M6ISs3fM2M=:D3rQKV3HPh740AaRfjWrb6 Bfxi97qb27j7QrcUozCLZ4SPZkXl40jIlCqka6HFhCBvmpKLAIBoIVbyt8LRZ8DwYnbZnzZri ZIYV9nvMMW58FKffv9kN+f3YPi8Vjr8lNODjbXjHytm6ZJfkefutq2P4xh7aWbYmtbHh8CdTK /P3NChotrt3w23PTlSxakmQSq6UaPuj35fyr1rfXk7VeX+00yxOws7Gy6JyIuIm2Cut7FzFaI VCQq0BCIe7hqBLxggBO07f1/TX7rU4Og2TuD3ylJkWIUPD/oOw2BDtF0FN5iPoTS58BWn6+sN ktPaQijjDpQSikqagVPnD5WykDBljGNA/o1M5OfGOSnNBqfwdq2RoYxRSfRb6w0jxAQbXbfXo KgiRZCrJXR0VWt03vGxtiNOrlS3AeEcmtJpCii7qv66BFC4IKBRJ35l1NSwbFXjQhi5ntp9qb WMSPmuSQLY2yRLfuvXmZj5t8jlAdluWLcJJtjRYfhC8ebK9H7vx5qnu2QQQcVKasCDnZ5z3Zt SpqDrQpJVPu/m8XyzuErPXD9LyBzGBfaErTzhwOXV+VfllLwIantxxaIfAh4dwWrCwVt/Bj55 sRaz9uwRyjrUBdRugK/4qZ6kfuKrG7/BCK7TXJozllIRsK4Jdtwb/QzGmLdOzRTY4Jm4q1pPN 7RxcTvZIdh34WAQQU5NiwUkev8+NrOG7XTLEJUn40qweHaSUWW9VUNbW9JK7CcrfI2oBvwoq6 boJE0NDqfiYR3mGvUUhqthUP7W2tQbxBmSNr/K8BDzPbmxyO74Jsek1F1B2R/V7nSPVdXG3gr MhoDCT35YmFl6dWMid8ZEHCb+mF3/PBt0jcNnS1ybvHz4PcItQ= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> But it seems that we are stuck with specific software aspects. >> How would you like to see remaining open issues to be resolved >> there anyhow? > > FYI: I will drop this and (without any further notice) all future > patches from you, that do no follow the documented process in > Documentation/process/. Which details do you find that do not fit to this development specification so far? Are there any update suggestions left over which you could eventually accept? Regards, Markus