Re: [PATCH v1] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add support for controller debug logs.

[Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@codeaurora.org>]

Hi Matthias,

On 2018-10-02 01:18, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Hi Balakrishna,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 07:21:02PM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote:
>> This patch will prevent error messages splashing on console.
>> 
>> [   78.426697] Bluetooth: hci_core.c:hci_acldata_packet() hci0: ACL 
>> packet for unknown connection handle 3804
>> [   78.436682] Bluetooth: hci_core.c:hci_acldata_packet() hci0: ACL 
>> packet for unknown connection handle 3804
>> [   78.446639] Bluetooth: hci_core.c:hci_acldata_packet() hci0: ACL 
>> packet for unknown connection handle 3804
>> [   78.456596] Bluetooth: hci_core.c:hci_acldata_packet() hci0: ACL 
>> packet for unknown connection handle 3804
>> 
>> QCA wcn3990 will send the debug logs in the form of ACL packets.
>> While decoding packet in qca_recv(), marking the received debug log
>> packet as diagnostic packet.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Harish Bandi <c-hbandi@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> index d98ed0442201..a00910aaed54 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> @@ -63,6 +63,10 @@
>>  /* susclk rate */
>>  #define SUSCLK_RATE_32KHZ	32768
>> 
>> +/* Controller debug log header */
>> +#define QCA_DEBUG_HDR_MSB	0xDC
>> +#define QCA_DEBUG_HDR_LSB	0x2E
>> +
>>  /* HCI_IBS transmit side sleep protocol states */
>>  enum tx_ibs_states {
>>  	HCI_IBS_TX_ASLEEP,
>> @@ -849,6 +853,20 @@ static int qca_ibs_wake_ack(struct hci_dev *hdev, 
>> struct sk_buff *skb)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> 
>> +static int qca_recv_acl_data(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff 
>> *skb)
>> +{
>> +	/* We receive debug logs from chip as an ACL packets.
>> +	 * Instead of sending the data to ACL to decode the
>> +	 * received data, we are pushing them to the above layers
>> +	 * as a diagnostic packet.
>> +	 */
>> +	if ((skb->len > 2) && (skb->data[0] == QCA_DEBUG_HDR_MSB) &&
>> +	    (skb->data[1] == QCA_DEBUG_HDR_LSB))
>> +		return hci_recv_diag(hdev, skb);
>> +	else
>> +		return hci_recv_frame(hdev, skb);
> 
> nit: you could just do hci_recv_frame() after the if branch, instead
> of doing it in 'else'. That would make it clearer at first sight that
> the QCA debug packets are a special case and other packets normal
> operation.
> 

[Bala]: will update.

>> +}
>> +
>>  #define QCA_IBS_SLEEP_IND_EVENT \
>>  	.type = HCI_IBS_SLEEP_IND, \
>>  	.hlen = 0, \
>> @@ -870,13 +888,20 @@ static int qca_ibs_wake_ack(struct hci_dev 
>> *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>  	.lsize = 0, \
>>  	.maxlen = HCI_MAX_IBS_SIZE
>> 
>> +#define QCA_RECV_ACL_DATA \
>> +	.type = HCI_ACLDATA_PKT, \
>> +	.hlen = HCI_ACL_HDR_SIZE, \
>> +	.loff = 2, \
>> +	.lsize = 2, \
>> +	.maxlen = HCI_MAX_FRAME_SIZE
> 
> Is there any actual advantage of adding this 'macro' instead of just
> using H4_RECV_ACL, which is exactly the same?
> 

[Bala]: yes we can use same macro, will update.

>>  static const struct h4_recv_pkt qca_recv_pkts[] = {
>> -	{ H4_RECV_ACL,             .recv = hci_recv_frame    },
>>  	{ H4_RECV_SCO,             .recv = hci_recv_frame    },
>>  	{ H4_RECV_EVENT,           .recv = hci_recv_frame    },
>>  	{ QCA_IBS_WAKE_IND_EVENT,  .recv = qca_ibs_wake_ind  },
>>  	{ QCA_IBS_WAKE_ACK_EVENT,  .recv = qca_ibs_wake_ack  },
>>  	{ QCA_IBS_SLEEP_IND_EVENT, .recv = qca_ibs_sleep_ind },
>> +	{ QCA_RECV_ACL_DATA,       .recv = qca_recv_acl_data },
>>  };
>> 
>>  static int qca_recv(struct hci_uart *hu, const void *data, int count)

-- 
Regards
Balakrishna.