From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>
Cc: "Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"John Stultz" <jstultz@google.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Benjamin Segall" <bsegall@google.com>,
"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"王科 (Ke Wang)" <Ke.Wang@unisoc.com>,
"Xuewen Yan" <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>,
"hongyu.jin@unisoc.com" <hongyu.jin@unisoc.com>,
guohua.yan@unisoc.com
Subject: Re: [Question] Sched: Severe scheduling latency (>10s) observed on kernel 6.12 with specific workload
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:13:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ed0139b-9e34-491d-80cf-e818fadadd06@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB8ipk9rVnoNv8BYZihvvAk=VgUS6qpu6CiH1aBwP2L93vdrqA@mail.gmail.com>
On 08.04.26 03:50, Xuewen Yan wrote:
> Hi Dietmar and Vincent,
>
>> I tried to recreate your env as much as possible on qemu and ran your
>> rt-app file but I can't spot anything suspicious either. This is with
>> defconfig and cgroupv2.
>
> Could you please try the following configuration?
> To rule out Android's influence, I created two new cgroups:
> foreground_test and background_test.
> I then placed only rt-app threads into these groups. Even with this
> setup, we can still observe high scheduling latency for tasks in
> foreground_test.
Is this still on an Android (vendor hooks, etc.) or mainline 6.12.58
kernel/device?
> {
> "tasks" : {
> "t0" : {
> "instance" : 40,
> "priority" : 0,
> "cpus" : [ 0, 1, 2, 3 ],
> "taskgroup" : "/background_test",
> "loop" : -1,
> "run" : 200,
> "sleep" : 50
> },
> "t1" : {
> "instance" : 2,
> "priority" : 19,
> "cpus" : [ 0, 1, 2, 3 ],
> "taskgroup" : "/foreground_test",
> "loop" : -1,
> "run" : 60000,
> "sleep" : 100000
> },
> "t2" : {
> "instance" : 2,
> "priority" : 10,
> "cpus" : [ 0, 1, 2, 3 ],
> "taskgroup" : "/foreground_test",
> "loop" : -1,
> "run" : 5000,
> "sleep" : 100000
> }
> }
> }
With your rt-app file and moving the tasks into cgroupv2 taskgroups
manually:
t0-0 679 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/A
t0-1 680 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/A
t0-2 681 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/A
...
t0-37 716 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/A
t0-38 717 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/A
t0-39 718 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/A
t1-40 719 19 > /sys/fs/cgroup/B
t1-41 720 19 > /sys/fs/cgroup/B
t2-42 721 10 > /sys/fs/cgroup/B
t2-43 722 10 > /sys/fs/cgroup/B
10 highest wu_lat values on Arm64 qemu (-accel hvf):
v6.6
0.564159000 t2-43:684
0.306418000 t2-42:683
0.237134000 t2-43:684
0.166982000 t2-42:683
0.166674000 t2-42:683
0.161856000 t2-42:683
0.098879000 t2-43:684
0.097746000 t2-43:684
0.083329000 t2-42:683
0.082943000 t2-42:683
6.12.58
0.368566000 t2-43:939
0.228139000 t2-42:938
0.212454000 t2-43:939
0.207144000 t2-42:938
0.177373000 t2-43:939
0.148268000 t2-42:938
0.147619000 t2-42:938
0.125988000 t2-43:939
0.091564000 t2-42:938
0.088160000 t2-42:938
tip sched/core (7.0.0-rc6-00050-g985215804dcb)
0.395585000 t2-43:697
0.203889000 t2-43:697
0.101130000 t2-42:696
0.098782000 t2-42:696
0.084523000 t2-43:697
0.033895000 t2-42:696
0.031881000 t2-43:697
0.021958000 t2-42:696
0.018123000 t2-42:696
0.013132000 t0-7:661
Could you specify which tasks had those > 1s wu_lat values?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-10 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAB8ipk9N5_pO1Awp6PLnWt6hf1Bu_XtY3qGMJKqz=Uf6eZQejw@mail.gmail.com>
2026-04-01 4:25 ` [Question] Sched: Severe scheduling latency (>10s) observed on kernel 6.12 with specific workload John Stultz
2026-04-01 6:04 ` Xuewen Yan
2026-04-01 10:05 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-04-01 10:48 ` Xuewen Yan
2026-04-01 13:00 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-04-02 5:16 ` Xuewen Yan
2026-04-02 14:58 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-04-08 2:50 ` Xuewen Yan
2026-04-10 11:13 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2026-04-14 5:18 ` Xuewen Yan
2026-04-01 14:01 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-04-02 5:11 ` Xuewen Yan
2026-04-02 5:24 ` Xuewen Yan
2026-04-08 12:19 ` David Laight
2026-04-09 21:39 ` John Stultz
2026-04-10 3:31 ` Xuewen Yan
2026-04-10 4:01 ` John Stultz
2026-04-10 12:24 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-04-13 20:44 ` John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ed0139b-9e34-491d-80cf-e818fadadd06@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=Ke.Wang@unisoc.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=guohua.yan@unisoc.com \
--cc=hongyu.jin@unisoc.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
--cc=xuewen.yan@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox