Re: [PATCH v6 08/24] x86/resctrl: Track the number of dirty RMID a CLOSID has

[Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>]

Hi James,

On 9/14/2023 10:21 AM, James Morse wrote:

...

> @@ -796,13 +817,30 @@ void mbm_setup_overflow_handler(struct rdt_domain *dom, unsigned long delay_ms)
>  static int dom_data_init(struct rdt_resource *r)
>  {
>  	u32 idx_limit = resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx();
> +	u32 num_closid = resctrl_arch_get_num_closid(r);
>  	struct rmid_entry *entry = NULL;
> +	int err = 0, i;
>  	u32 idx;
> -	int i;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID)) {
> +		int *tmp;
> +
> +		tmp = kcalloc(num_closid, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);

Shouldn't this rather be sizeof(unsigned int) to match the type it will store?

> +		if (!tmp) {
> +			err = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto out_unlock;
> +		}
> +
> +		closid_num_dirty_rmid = tmp;
> +	}
>  
>  	rmid_ptrs = kcalloc(idx_limit, sizeof(struct rmid_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!rmid_ptrs)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +	if (!rmid_ptrs) {
> +		kfree(closid_num_dirty_rmid);
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < idx_limit; i++) {
>  		entry = &rmid_ptrs[i];
> @@ -822,13 +860,21 @@ static int dom_data_init(struct rdt_resource *r)
>  	entry = __rmid_entry(idx);
>  	list_del(&entry->list);
>  
> -	return 0;
> +out_unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
> +
> +	return err;
>  }
>  
>  void resctrl_exit_mon_l3_config(struct rdt_resource *r)
>  {
>  	mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
>  
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_CLOSID)) {
> +		kfree(closid_num_dirty_rmid);
> +		closid_num_dirty_rmid = NULL;
> +	}
> +
>  	kfree(rmid_ptrs);
>  	rmid_ptrs = NULL;
>  

Awaiting response on patch #2 related to above hunk.

Reinette