From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
geert@linux-m68k.org
Cc: stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Add support for devices with multiple PM domains
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:42:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f96256d-0de5-26a2-e656-7912e06806ea@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490710443-27425-5-git-send-email-jonathanh@nvidia.com>
On 03/28/2017 07:44 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Now that the generic PM domain framework supports consumers that can
> control multiple PM domains, update the device-tree binding for generic
> PM domains to state that one or more PM domain is permitted for a
> device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> index 723e1ad937da..fb28d37f9e1f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> @@ -20,8 +20,15 @@ Required properties:
> as specified by device tree binding documentation of particular provider.
>
> Optional properties:
> - - power-domains : A phandle and PM domain specifier as defined by bindings of
> - the power controller specified by phandle.
> + - power-domains : An array of one or more PM domain specifiers (defined by the
> + bindings of the PM domain provider) for each PM domain that
> + is required by the device.
> + - power-domain-names: A list of strings of PM domain names. The list must have
> + a name for each PM domain specifier in the
> + 'power-domains' property and these names must be unique
> + within the context of this property. The names must be
> + indexed so that the first name corresponds to the first
> + PM domain specifier and so on.
These bindings are for power-domain providers. We also need to update the bindings
for the consumers (look further down in the same file)
> Some power domains might be powered from another power domain (or have
> other hardware specific dependencies). For representing such dependency
> a standard PM domain consumer binding is used. When provided, all domains
>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-10 4:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-28 14:13 [RFC PATCH 0/4] PM / Domains: Add support for explicit control of PM domains Jon Hunter
2017-03-28 14:14 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] PM / Domains: Prepare for supporting explicit PM domain control Jon Hunter
2017-03-28 14:14 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] PM / Domains: Add support for explicit control of PM domains Jon Hunter
2017-04-10 4:09 ` Rajendra Nayak
2017-04-10 8:24 ` Jon Hunter
2017-04-10 10:02 ` Rajendra Nayak
2017-04-10 19:48 ` Jon Hunter
2017-03-28 14:14 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] PM / Domains: Add OF helpers for getting " Jon Hunter
2017-03-28 14:14 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Add support for devices with multiple " Jon Hunter
2017-04-10 4:12 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2017-04-10 8:24 ` Jon Hunter
2017-04-25 11:13 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] PM / Domains: Add support for explicit control of " Jon Hunter
2017-04-25 19:34 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-04-25 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-05-02 10:10 ` Jon Hunter
2017-05-02 21:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-05-03 8:12 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-05-03 8:32 ` Jon Hunter
2017-05-03 13:43 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-05-03 14:57 ` Jon Hunter
2017-05-03 17:12 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-05-04 8:44 ` Jon Hunter
2017-05-30 3:41 ` Rajendra Nayak
2017-10-09 16:36 ` Todor Tomov
2017-10-10 9:13 ` Jon Hunter
2017-05-03 8:12 ` Jon Hunter
2017-04-26 8:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-26 9:04 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-04-26 9:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-26 9:55 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-05-03 6:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-05-03 8:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3f96256d-0de5-26a2-e656-7912e06806ea@codeaurora.org \
--to=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox