From: vamsi krishna <vamsi.krishnak@gmail.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel.
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:57:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3faf0568050816142715f14c2c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B8E391BBE9FE384DAA4C5C003888BE6F04294461@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com>
Hello All,
Really thankful for your inputs!
> Itanium instruction set is not as compact as some other architectures,
> so the same program will typically require more bytes of code.
I stopped the program on both amd64 machine and ia64 machine and
grepped the values from /proc/<>/status and found the following.
<----Linux IPF----------->
VmSize: 126304 kB
VmLck: 0 kB
VmRSS: 6352 kB
VmData: 19696 kB
VmStk: 16 kB
VmExe: 97760 kB
VmLib: 3152 kB
<------------------------>
<------AMD64------------->
VmSize: 100432 kB
VmLck: 0 kB
VmRSS: 2828 kB
VmData: 24428 kB
VmStk: 264 kB
VmExe: 62848 kB
VmLib: 3048 kB
<----------------------->
Seems like most of core size(VmSize) on ipf (126MB) is coming from the
code size(VmExe) i.e 97MB. While the code size is just 62MB on amd64.
Looks like IA-64 wastes a lot of VM due to big instruction sizes, so
big instruction sizes will improve performance ? compared small
instruction sizes? , but fetching big instructions surely takes time
compared to small, this may be the reason why amd64 is the fasttest
64-bit process ?
Thanks a lot!
Vamsi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-16 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-16 20:44 Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel Luck, Tony
2005-08-16 21:27 ` vamsi krishna [this message]
2005-08-17 19:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-18 9:54 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-18 18:29 ` Anton Blanchard
2005-08-18 21:28 ` David S. Miller
2005-08-18 22:18 ` George Anzinger
2005-08-19 11:00 ` Ingo Oeser
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-16 20:36 vamsi krishna
2005-08-16 20:41 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-08-16 21:05 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3faf0568050816142715f14c2c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vamsi.krishnak@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox