public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vamsi krishna <vamsi.krishnak@gmail.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel.
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:57:54 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3faf0568050816142715f14c2c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B8E391BBE9FE384DAA4C5C003888BE6F04294461@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com>

Hello All,

Really thankful for your inputs!

> Itanium instruction set is not as compact as some other architectures,
> so the same program will typically require more bytes of code.

I stopped the program on both amd64 machine and ia64 machine and
grepped the values from /proc/<>/status and found the following.

<----Linux IPF----------->
VmSize:   126304 kB
VmLck:         0 kB
VmRSS:      6352 kB
VmData:    19696 kB
VmStk:        16 kB
VmExe:     97760 kB
VmLib:      3152 kB
<------------------------>

<------AMD64------------->
VmSize:   100432 kB
VmLck:         0 kB
VmRSS:      2828 kB
VmData:    24428 kB
VmStk:       264 kB
VmExe:     62848 kB
VmLib:      3048 kB
<----------------------->

Seems like most of core size(VmSize) on ipf (126MB) is coming from the
code size(VmExe) i.e 97MB. While the code size is just 62MB on amd64.

Looks like IA-64 wastes a lot of VM due to big instruction sizes, so
big instruction sizes will improve performance ? compared small
instruction sizes? , but fetching big instructions surely takes time
compared to small, this may be the reason why amd64 is the fasttest
64-bit process ?

Thanks a lot!
Vamsi

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-16 21:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-16 20:44 Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel Luck, Tony
2005-08-16 21:27 ` vamsi krishna [this message]
2005-08-17 19:52   ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-18  9:54     ` Alan Cox
2005-08-18 18:29     ` Anton Blanchard
2005-08-18 21:28       ` David S. Miller
2005-08-18 22:18         ` George Anzinger
2005-08-19 11:00           ` Ingo Oeser
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-16 20:36 vamsi krishna
2005-08-16 20:41 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-08-16 21:05 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3faf0568050816142715f14c2c@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=vamsi.krishnak@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox