From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265229AbUAJR1p (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:27:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265230AbUAJR1o (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:27:44 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:17378 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265229AbUAJR1n (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:27:43 -0500 Message-ID: <400035F5.3040300@pobox.com> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:27:17 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Piotr Kaczuba CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: tulip driver: errors instead TX packets? References: <20040110144831.GA16080@orbiter.attika.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <20040110144831.GA16080@orbiter.attika.ath.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Piotr Kaczuba wrote: > I've got a ADMtek Centaur (3cSOHO100B-TX) running with the tulip driver > on 2.6.1. I wonder if anyone has noticed that ifconfig shows the > packets sent in the errors field instead of the TX packets field. At > least, this is what I assume because it shows 0 TX packets and 11756 > errors. This is an old error, but since packets show up, nobody bothers with the incorrect statistics... Jeff