From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265853AbUAKMNo (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:13:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265854AbUAKMNo (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:13:44 -0500 Received: from mx02.qsc.de ([213.148.130.14]:1416 "EHLO mx02.qsc.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265853AbUAKMMp (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:12:45 -0500 Message-ID: <40013CBF.1080707@trash.net> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:08:31 +0100 From: Patrick McHardy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031107 Debian/1.5-3 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Harald Welte CC: Wilmer van der Gaast , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Netfilter Development Mailinglist Subject: Re: 2.4.23 masquerading broken? References: <20031202165653.GJ615@gaast.net> <3FCCCB02.5070203@trash.net> <20040110215954.GC20706@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <40012825.60405@trash.net> In-Reply-To: <40012825.60405@trash.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Patrick McHardy wrote: > BTW: Why do we need a route lookup at all ? Couldn't we just use the > first address on dev->in_dev->ifa_list ? > I've attached two patches (2.4+2.6) to the bugtracker which change MASQUERADE to use indev->ifa_list->ifa_local. The 2.6 version is running here without problems so far. Please have a look at https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=144 . Best regards, Patrick