public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ethan Weinstein <lists@stinkfoot.org>
To: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
Cc: Ed Tomlinson <edt@aei.ca>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, piggin@cyberone.com.au, "Kamble,
	Nitin A" <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.1 and irq balancing
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:50:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40039529.2040709@stinkfoot.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D37200173618820@scsmsx402.sc.intel.com>

Nakajima, Jun wrote:

>> Admittedly, the machine's load was not high when I took this sample.
>> However, creating a great deal of load does not change these statistics 
>> at all.  Being that there are patches available for 2.4.x kernels to 
>> fix this, I don't think this at all by design, but what do I know? =)
>>  

> 2.6 kernels don't need a patch to it as far as I understand. Are you
> saying that with significant amount of load, you did not see any
> distribution of interrupts? Today's threshold in the kernel is high
> because we found moving around interrupts frequently rather hurt the
> cache and thus lower the performance compared to "do nothing". Can you
> try to create significant load with your network (eth0 and eh1) and see
> what happens? 
> 
> Jun 

Here's the situation two days later, I created some brief periods of 
high load on eth1 and I see we have some change:


            CPU0       CPU1       CPU2       CPU3
   0:  184932542          0    2592511          0    IO-APIC-edge  timer
   1:       1875          0          0          0    IO-APIC-edge  i8042
   2:          0          0          0          0          XT-PIC  cascade
   3:    3046103          0          0          0    IO-APIC-edge  serial
   8:          2          0          0          0    IO-APIC-edge  rtc
   9:          0          0          0          0   IO-APIC-level  acpi
  14:         76          0          0          0    IO-APIC-edge  ide0
  16:    2978264          0          0          0   IO-APIC-level  sym53c8xx
  22:    7838940          0          0          0   IO-APIC-level  eth0
  48:     916078          0     125150          0   IO-APIC-level  aic79xx
  49:    1099375          0          0          0   IO-APIC-level  aic79xx
  54:   51484241        316   50560879        279   IO-APIC-level  eth1
NMI:          0          0          0          0
LOC:  187530735  187530988  187530981  187530986
ERR:          0
MIS:          0


My argument is (see below).  This is an old 2x pentium2 @400, also 
running 2.6, an old Compaq Proliant to be exact.  This machine obviously 
has no HT, so why the balanced load?


            CPU0       CPU1
   0: 1066522197 1117196193    IO-APIC-edge  timer
   1:         42         19    IO-APIC-edge  i8042
   2:          0          0          XT-PIC  cascade
   5:   23523428   23510845   IO-APIC-level  TLAN
   8:          0          4    IO-APIC-edge  rtc
   9:         15         15   IO-APIC-level  sym53c8xx
  10:    6874323    6809042   IO-APIC-level  sym53c8xx
  11:    7545802    7509034   IO-APIC-level  ida0
  14:          8          2    IO-APIC-edge  ide0
NMI:          0          0
LOC: 2183867261 2183867237
ERR:          0
MIS:          0



Ethan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-01-13  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-11 23:59 2.6.1 and irq balancing Nakajima, Jun
2004-01-12  4:42 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-01-12 14:06   ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-01-12 16:10   ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-01-13  6:50 ` Ethan Weinstein [this message]
2004-01-13  7:05   ` Nick Piggin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-13  8:09 Nakajima, Jun
2004-01-13  7:57 Nakajima, Jun
2004-01-10 23:14 Ethan Weinstein
2004-01-11  2:39 ` Ed Tomlinson
2004-01-11  3:38   ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-11  9:52     ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-01-11  5:19   ` Ethan Weinstein
2004-01-11  9:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-01-11 16:50   ` Joe Korty
2004-01-11 18:19     ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-01-15 11:43     ` Pavel Machek
2004-01-11 13:14 ` Martin Schlemmer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40039529.2040709@stinkfoot.org \
    --to=lists@stinkfoot.org \
    --cc=edt@aei.ca \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nitin.a.kamble@intel.com \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox