From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261909AbUAXVPp (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:15:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262164AbUAXVPp (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:15:45 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:32228 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261909AbUAXVPm (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:15:42 -0500 Message-ID: <4012E071.2080704@pobox.com> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:15:29 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David S. Miller" CC: grundler@parisc-linux.org, jgarzik@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.1 tg3 DMA engine test failure References: <20040124013614.GB1310@colo.lackof.org> <20040123.210023.74723544.davem@redhat.com> <20040124073032.GA7265@colo.lackof.org> <20040123.233241.59493446.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20040123.233241.59493446.davem@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David, There were two separate components to Grant's patch (hint ggg... split up your patches). What do you think about GRC-resets-sub-components part? That appears valid (and probably wise) to me, but correct me if I'm wrong... Jeff