From: Bart Samwel <bart@samwel.tk>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkv@isg.de
Subject: Re: Is there a way to keep the 2.6 kjournald from writing to idle disks? (to allow spin-downs)
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 19:54:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4016B3F0.1060804@samwel.tk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1040127133932.11664B-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Well, it's the o.p. system, not mine, but I don't see how noatime will
> help him, the atime shouldn't change unless he's doing disk access, and
> if he's doing disk access the disk will spin up anyway.
> The place noatime helps is when actually doing reads to open files, and
> getting an inode update free with every read. His problem is that
> something really is accessing the drive, and he won't get the desired
> spindown until that's addressed.
If something really is accessing the drive, noatime might still help as
long as the accesses are from the cache. BTW, it wasn't clear to me from
his posts that he knows that something is _really_ accessing the drive,
I thought he only had kjournald activity -- and that might be explained
by atime updates. But I might have missed something of course!
> I hope the original poster is following this ;-)
I added him to the CC list again. That should fix it. :)
-- Bart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-27 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-25 18:29 Is there a way to keep the 2.6 kjournald from writing to idle disks? (to allow spin-downs) Lutz Vieweg
2004-01-25 18:33 ` Andreas Dilger
2004-01-25 18:56 ` Matthias Andree
2004-01-25 19:26 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-01-26 10:16 ` Lutz Vieweg
2004-01-26 10:43 ` Nick Piggin
2004-01-26 10:43 ` Bart Samwel
2004-01-25 20:52 ` Micha Feigin
2004-01-27 0:21 ` bill davidsen
2004-01-27 15:16 ` Bart Samwel
2004-01-27 18:44 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-01-27 18:54 ` Bart Samwel [this message]
2004-01-28 13:30 ` Lutz Vieweg
2004-01-28 23:06 ` Micha Feigin
2004-01-29 12:51 ` Bart Samwel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4016B3F0.1060804@samwel.tk \
--to=bart@samwel.tk \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkv@isg.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox