public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patch
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 10:05:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40194B6D.6060906@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040129132623.GB13225@mail.shareable.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jamie Lokier wrote:

> I like the second approach more.  You can change glibc to look up the
> weak symbol for _all_ syscalls, then none of them are special and it
> will work with future kernel optimisations.

Symbol lookups are slow.  And they require the syscall stubs to suddenly
set up the usual PIC infrastructure since a jump through the PLT is
used.  This is much slower than the extra indirection the vdso could do.

The vdso is just one of the DSOs in the search path and usually the very
last.  So there would be possible many objects which are looked at
first, unsuccessfully.

And another problem I should have mentioned last night: in statically
linked applications the vDSO isn't used this way.  Do dynamic linker
functionality is available.  We find the vDSO through the auxiliary
vector and use the absolute address, not the symbol table of the vDSO.
If the syscall entry in the vDSO would do the dispatch automatically,
statically linked apps would benefit from the optimizations, too.
Otherwise they are left out.


- -- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAGUtt2ijCOnn/RHQRAgLwAKCcvvzg/FB8/8C+Jo1I6wfWBju25gCeKr4z
kErg4cvJuxBvmRltLF4AxEE=
=f2aR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-29 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-29  2:46 [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patch john stultz
2004-01-29  5:06 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-01-29 13:26   ` Jamie Lokier
2004-01-29 18:05     ` Ulrich Drepper [this message]
2004-01-29 19:15       ` Jamie Lokier
2004-01-29 23:59         ` john stultz
2004-01-30  0:40           ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-01-30  0:31         ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-01-30  4:17           ` Jamie Lokier
2004-01-30  5:09             ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-01-30  9:29               ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-03  4:38                 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-01-30 17:34               ` Jamie Lokier
2004-01-30  8:33             ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-01-30 17:21               ` Jamie Lokier
2004-01-31  0:10     ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-31  2:41       ` Jamie Lokier
2004-01-31  5:54         ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-02-01  1:28   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-03  4:35     ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-02-03  5:34       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-03  8:52       ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-03 16:25         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-03 17:37           ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-03 18:10             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-03 18:23               ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-03 18:34                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-01-31  0:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-31  2:20   ` john stultz
     [not found] <1075344395.1592.87.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <401894DA.7000609@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]   ` <20040201012803.GN26076@dualathlon.random.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]     ` <401F251C.2090300@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]       ` <20040203085224.GA15738@mail.shareable.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]         ` <20040203162515.GY26076@dualathlon.random.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]           ` <20040203173716.GC17895@mail.shareable.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]             ` <20040203181001.GA26076@dualathlon.random.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]               ` <20040203182310.GA18326@mail.shareable.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2004-02-04  2:27                 ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-04  2:40                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-04  4:21                   ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-05 21:43                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-06  4:15                       ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-06  4:28                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-06  9:23                           ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-02-06 15:49                             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-07  0:37                               ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-02-07  2:19                                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-07  3:37                                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-07  4:36                                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-07  4:53                                       ` Jamie Lokier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40194B6D.6060906@redhat.com \
    --to=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox